Re: [PATCH 1/2] doc, xen: document hypervisor sysfs nodes for xen

From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] doc, xen: document hypervisor sysfs nodes for xen
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 16:20:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b11999f4-f551-40f3-6527-671c96162187__38030.2739482888$1495462898$gmane$org@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41703c16-f2c4-7f35-b445-33bf35ea7f56@oracle.com>

On 22/05/17 15:30, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 05/22/2017 04:56 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Today only a few sysfs nodes under /sys/hypervisor/ are documented
>> for Xen in Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor-pmu. Rename
>> this file to Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor and add
>> descriptions of the other nodes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor     | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor-pmu |  23 -----
>>  MAINTAINERS                                    |   1 +
>>  3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor
>>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor-pmu
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-hypervisor
> 
> I wonder whether at least some of the non-pmu entries should by now be
> considered stable.

Hmm, do you think the pmu entries are not?

I could:

a) move sysfs-hypervisor as posted here to stable
b) leave the pmu entries in testing and just add another doc for
   the non-pmu entries in stable
c) do some split of the non-pmu entries (which to put where?)
d) or let it all in testing

Next question then: where to put the new guest_type of patch 2?

Juergen

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel