All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: add a test case to verify scrub speed throttle works
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 07:17:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b35e20df-9c9d-04b2-4830-46affac5c48f@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151e5c83-6de6-9950-d1ce-8a375acea356@oracle.com>



On 2023/1/5 06:17, Anand Jain wrote:
> On 1/4/23 16:21, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> We introduced scrub speed throttle in commit eb3b50536642 ("btrfs: scrub:
>> per-device bandwidth control"),  but it is not that well documented
>> (e.g. what's the unit of the sysfs interface), nor tested by any test
>> case.
>>
>> This patch will add a test case for this functionality.
>>
>> The test case itself is pretty straightforward:
>>
>> - Fill the fs with 2G file as scrub workload
>> - Set scrub speed limit to 50MiB/s
>> - Scrub and compare the reported rate against above 50MiB/s throttle
>>
>> However the test case has an assumption that the underlying disk must be
>> faster than our 50MiB/s, which should be pretty common in
>> baremetal/exclusive VMs.
>> But for cloud environment it's not ensured 100%, thus the test case is
>> not included in auto group to avoid false alerts.
> 
> 
> Why not scrub the data twice: first to determine the speed, and then to 
> check if it can be throttled to ~50%?

Sounds great.

Thanks,
Qu
> 
> -Anand
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-04 23:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-04  8:21 [PATCH] btrfs: add a test case to verify scrub speed throttle works Qu Wenruo
2023-01-04 22:17 ` Anand Jain
2023-01-04 23:17   ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2023-01-05  7:18 Qu Wenruo
2023-01-05 11:04 ` Anand Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b35e20df-9c9d-04b2-4830-46affac5c48f@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.