From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 12:21:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH net 000/117] net: avoid to remove module when its debugfs is being used In-Reply-To: (sfid-20201009_121527_238342_F5A29EF9) References: <20201008155048.17679-1-ap420073@gmail.com> <1cbb69d83188424e99b2d2482848ae64@AcuMS.aculab.com> <62f6c2bd11ed8b25c1cd4462ebc6db870adc4229.camel@sipsolutions.net> <87v9fkgf4i.fsf@suse.de> (sfid-20201009_121527_238342_F5A29EF9) Message-ID: <4a58caee3b6b8975f4ff632bf6d2a6673788157d.camel@sipsolutions.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Taehee Yoo Cc: Nicolai Stange , David Laight , "davem@davemloft.net" , "kuba@kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "wil6210@qti.qualcomm.com" , "brcm80211-dev-list@cypress.com" , "b43-dev@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" On Fri, 2020-10-09 at 19:15 +0900, Taehee Yoo wrote: > > Okay, as you mentioned earlier in 001/117 patch thread, > I will squash patches into per-driver/subsystem then send them as v2. Give me a bit. I think I figured out a less intrusive way that at least means we don't have to do it if the fops doesn't have ->release(), which is the vast majority. johannes