All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
To: "Teres Alexis, Alan Previn" <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>,
	"Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org"
	<Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org>
Cc: "DRI-Devel@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org" <DRI-Devel@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/guc: More debug print updates - GuC reg capture
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 18:55:14 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b5925597-c753-792d-5770-07e60201b4a6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2436cd1682d0dc3d36900e6f2114d0ffcb823acb.camel@intel.com>

On 2/4/2023 00:19, Teres Alexis, Alan Previn wrote:
> So i do have one request - but its a nit - for the following case, should it be a guc_warn instead of a guc_dbg?
> (last hunk in this patch)
> 	"No register capture node found for 0x%04X / 0x%08X\n",
> 	ce->guc_id.id, ce->lrc.lrca);"
Did that get discussed in the original code review? I vaguely recall 
some reason for it not being a warning. But maybe I'm thinking of 
something else?

> Otherwise LGTM,
> Reviewed-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
>
> On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 16:11 -0800, John.C.Harrison@Intel.com wrote:
>> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>>
>> Update a bunch more debug prints to use the new GT based scheme.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>> ---
>>   .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c    | 51 ++++++++-----------
>>   1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c
>> index fc3b994626a4f..5f6e3594dda62 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_capture.c
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> alan:snip


  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-07  2:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-03  0:11 [PATCH 0/6] More drm_dbg to guc_dbg changes John.C.Harrison
2023-02-03  0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] " John.C.Harrison
2023-02-03  0:11 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/guc: More debug print updates - UC firmware John.C.Harrison
2023-02-03  0:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " John.C.Harrison
2023-02-03  9:39   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2023-02-03 17:35     ` John Harrison
2023-02-03  0:11 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/guc: More debug print updates - GSC firmware John.C.Harrison
2023-02-03  0:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " John.C.Harrison
2023-02-03  9:43   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2023-02-03  9:43     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2023-02-03  0:11 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/guc: More debug print updates - GuC reg capture John.C.Harrison
2023-02-03  0:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " John.C.Harrison
2023-02-04  8:19   ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2023-02-07  2:55     ` John Harrison [this message]
2023-02-03  0:11 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/guc: More debug print updates - GuC selftests John.C.Harrison
2023-02-03  0:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " John.C.Harrison
2023-02-03  9:54   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2023-02-03 17:43     ` John Harrison
2023-02-03  0:11 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/guc: More debug print updates - GuC SLPC John.C.Harrison
2023-02-03  0:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " John.C.Harrison
2023-02-03 10:00   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2023-02-03 10:00     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2023-02-03  0:11 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/guc: More debug print updates - GuC logging John.C.Harrison
2023-02-03  0:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " John.C.Harrison
2023-02-03 10:02   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2023-02-03 10:02     ` [Intel-gfx] " Michal Wajdeczko
2023-02-03  1:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for More drm_dbg to guc_dbg changes Patchwork
2023-02-03 12:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b5925597-c753-792d-5770-07e60201b4a6@intel.com \
    --to=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
    --cc=DRI-Devel@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
    --cc=Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
    --cc=alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.