From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.62]:50714 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726467AbeIXCJH (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Sep 2018 22:09:07 -0400 Message-ID: <1537733414.1707.8.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20180923_221027_281716_D4D7C489) Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] backports: Remove ssb and bcma From: Johannes Berg To: Hauke Mehrtens Cc: backports@vger.kernel.org, john@phrozen.org Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 22:10:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20180923174535.16198-2-hauke@hauke-m.de> (sfid-20180923_194547_614863_47F61E59) References: <20180923174535.16198-1-hauke@hauke-m.de> <20180923174535.16198-2-hauke@hauke-m.de> (sfid-20180923_194547_614863_47F61E59) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: backports-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 2018-09-23 at 19:45 +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > Use the versions shipped with the kernel instead. > bcma and ssb didn't change much in the last few years, most of the > changes were related to code only used on embedded devices. Removing > this reduces the number of parts we have to backport. b43, b43legacy and > brcmsmac work well with the in kernel version. > patches/0051-no-wakeup_path/ssb.patch | 12 ----------- > patches/0069-remove-of_irq/bcma.patch | 24 ---------------------- > 11 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-) Is that really worth it? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in