From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_TVD_MIME_EPI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86830C67863 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 19:49:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4562064C for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 19:49:11 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BA4562064C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=hauke-m.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=backports-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726894AbeJWEJC (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:09:02 -0400 Received: from mx1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.212]:33590 "EHLO mx1.mailbox.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726889AbeJWEJC (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:09:02 -0400 Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.240]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B8114B45D; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 21:49:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240]) by spamfilter02.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter02.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.116]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id pZVvYbvOWUFV; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 21:49:08 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [Cocci] New release after 1.0.7? To: Johannes Berg , Arend van Spriel Cc: "backports@vger.kernel.org" References: <32b52167e7dd5734ba4aa5f21aa1fddd257e6292.camel@intel.com> <1536564277.3224.7.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1536747369.3678.11.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1be0fb185e04dd80f57fcf1fe04ddf5491601f3d.camel@sipsolutions.net> From: Hauke Mehrtens Message-ID: <6e4b8e78-8a10-3987-dbbb-7793e351e355@hauke-m.de> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 21:49:03 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1be0fb185e04dd80f57fcf1fe04ddf5491601f3d.camel@sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Ji54ca0zIKpkn71525dDbm7uJGT8Ugn6T" Sender: backports-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: backports@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Ji54ca0zIKpkn71525dDbm7uJGT8Ugn6T Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="xT57DvNm7jcneC0YiJ9leaYrGtwlwl0vP"; protected-headers="v1" From: Hauke Mehrtens To: Johannes Berg , Arend van Spriel Cc: "backports@vger.kernel.org" Message-ID: <6e4b8e78-8a10-3987-dbbb-7793e351e355@hauke-m.de> Subject: Re: [Cocci] New release after 1.0.7? References: <32b52167e7dd5734ba4aa5f21aa1fddd257e6292.camel@intel.com> <1536564277.3224.7.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1536747369.3678.11.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1be0fb185e04dd80f57fcf1fe04ddf5491601f3d.camel@sipsolutions.net> In-Reply-To: <1be0fb185e04dd80f57fcf1fe04ddf5491601f3d.camel@sipsolutions.net> --xT57DvNm7jcneC0YiJ9leaYrGtwlwl0vP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/22/2018 01:45 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 13:44 +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: >> On 9/12/2018 12:16 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: >>> On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 12:14 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: >>> >>>>> I see now that the website advertises the 1.0.7 release, however >>>>> >>>>> * it's not tagged in git(hub) - all previous releases have a tag >>>>> * commit c1522bde ("Release 1.0.7") is NOT what's released as 1.0.= 7 on >>>>> the website >>>>> * it *looks* like the actual 1.0.7 release was cut from a much new= er >>>>> git commit, likely with the fix? >>>> >>>> There is now a tag for the official release of 1.0.7 in github. >>> >>> Great, thanks! >> >> Were you able to build this tag? I probably have dependency issues on = >> our build server. I tried following the install.txt in coccinelle repo= ,=20 >> but still getting failures. Some hints might be useful. The server run= s=20 >> ubuntu trusty which is pretty old of course. >=20 > Hmm. I built something, either that tag or the tarball? >=20 > johannes I built the tag on Debian stable successfully, some older versions did not build but this tag worked. Hauke --xT57DvNm7jcneC0YiJ9leaYrGtwlwl0vP-- --Ji54ca0zIKpkn71525dDbm7uJGT8Ugn6T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEyz0/uAcd+JwXmwtD8bdnhZyy68cFAlvOKbMACgkQ8bdnhZyy 68eEywgA20vGqcGtjXClzOmd2RVql1ZXp717bF1XTcqgLzTGckGpnolv5NGgjLH0 cruQUBwijxLjgYTXXqi5Y7f7kA1Sf0vZn5Xbrw9HCUfI2d1ev/OeZmDBQbj+Fkd+ lWT7RK8SMNbLPYHDGOu560Vjjq/rJtDa/84KIOb6NkC7csry7R1TCYe8iCKo/j3r 1rjrw+hRl4zl63/UKYYUx/fwV758ARsrWHGLNVWRGXp8OJsq2ncD9grEOWFK3vOj RrTcVDeg5a6yJnQn3h2KLwCPy5LqTIE+kQmzzzRcls6kyGZ0C+hJAaQUw5wC+AjS l70Bpl3Ea3um0dC6PJ4WFZxntQUsIQ== =x6yB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Ji54ca0zIKpkn71525dDbm7uJGT8Ugn6T-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in