From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Sven Eckelmann Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:40:59 +0200 Message-Id: <1284738065-8715-4-git-send-email-sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <1284738065-8715-1-git-send-email-sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> References: <1284738065-8715-1-git-send-email-sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> Subject: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 3/9] batman-adv: Always protect list_for_each_entry_rcu with RCU Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org receive_bat_packet is not called with rcu_read_lock so we must ensure by ourself that we protect list_for_each_entry_rcu using the correct RCU locks. Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann --- batman-adv/routing.c | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/batman-adv/routing.c b/batman-adv/routing.c index 603a932..1781b7e 100644 --- a/batman-adv/routing.c +++ b/batman-adv/routing.c @@ -575,6 +575,7 @@ void receive_bat_packet(struct ethhdr *ethhdr, batman_packet->tq, batman_packet->ttl, batman_packet->version, has_directlink_flag); + rcu_read_lock(); list_for_each_entry_rcu(batman_if, &if_list, list) { if (batman_if->if_status != IF_ACTIVE) continue; @@ -597,6 +598,7 @@ void receive_bat_packet(struct ethhdr *ethhdr, if (compare_orig(ethhdr->h_source, broadcast_addr)) is_broadcast = 1; } + rcu_read_unlock(); if (batman_packet->version != COMPAT_VERSION) { bat_dbg(DBG_BATMAN, bat_priv, -- 1.7.2.3