> @@ -1842,8 +1844,12 @@ static int batadv_iv_ogm_receive(struct sk_buff *skb,
>  
>                 packet_pos = skb->data + ogm_offset;
>                 ogm_packet = (struct batadv_ogm_packet *)packet_pos;
> +
> +               skb_set_network_header(skb, ogm_offset);
>         }
>  
> +       skb_reset_network_header(skb);
> +
>         kfree_skb(skb);
>         return NET_RX_SUCCESS;
>  }

[...]
On Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2016 08:41:40 CET Linus Lüssing wrote:
> What do you think about wrapping the WARN_ON, while loop and
> skb_reset_network_header() into a new function with a functional,
> non-modifying touch regarding the input skb?
> 
> Or do you think I should just remove the
> skb_reset_network_header() here?

Hm, my point was not actually about the loop or the skb_set_network_header or
the WARN_ON. I only don't know why a skb_reset_network_header would be
necessary before a kfree_skb/consume_skb.

It also doesn't seem to be used in a later patch.

Kind regards,
	Sven