b.a.t.m.a.n.lists.open-mesh.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@gmx.de>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.net>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] mailing list migration (was: development flow)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:14:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909291814.53591.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5161afcd0909290856w41dc1d10l3b109c2e68155f70@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 2037 bytes --]

[...]
> > * We create the additional new list while keeping the old one. The new
> > list is for the communication with the kernel developers.
> >
> > Opinions ?
> 
> I think that having two lists would be a hassle and a mistake.  To
> have two lists at one host might work, but one list at VGER and
> another somewhere else could be counter-productive, as "internal"
> communication would be constantly forwarded to the kernel list, and
> relevant kernel traffic would have to be forwarded back to the
> "internal" list.  Think about that for a second.  Eventually, we would
> probably just drop one list.
> 
> If one list is O(n), then two lists are O(n^2) for anyone who needs
> both.  I vote for one list, no matter where it's hosted.
Don't understand the calculation as I would prefer + instead of * here, but 
this isn't the point (and if you would do program a bad matching algorithm 
here it is still O(M*N) ).
Don't think that two lists are good without a good topic split. I see a reason 
for -devel, -users and -announcements list in some projects, but not for a 
list for "kernel people" and for "other people".

> commercial solution (EMWD):
>  - spam filtering
>  - open-mesh.net
>  - small price < US$20/month
> 
> open source host (VGER, freelists.org)
>  - spam filtering
>  - their-domain.com
>  - no price
>  - we get added to their project directory, so potential contributors see
>  us
Haven't followed the whole discussion, but is it real such a big problem to 
change the mailing list address? OK, it shouldn't be done every week, but this 
is done for a good reason. Just do an announcement on this list and create an 
auto reply (smtp failure notice with further information) when someone writes 
to the old list.
Maybe more interesting is the fact that if we can import old information into 
the new list. I think mailman stores everything in simple mboxes, or am I 
wrong?
And also interesting if we can do backups of the data on vger and co.

Best regards,
	Sven

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-29 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-30  1:36 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [patch] adding subgraph-feature to vis-output in dot-file-format Linus Lüssing
2009-08-30  1:59 ` Linus Lüssing
2009-08-30  7:37 ` Andrew Lunn
2009-08-30 20:23   ` Simon Wunderlich
2009-08-31  5:26     ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] development flow Marek Lindner
2009-08-31  5:50       ` Andrew Lunn
2009-09-01 18:47         ` Marek Lindner
2009-09-02  6:18           ` Andrew Lunn
2009-09-03  6:06             ` Marek Lindner
2009-09-08 16:01               ` Andrew Lunn
2009-09-08 17:54                 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] mailing list migration (was: development flow) Marek Lindner
2009-09-18 21:14                   ` Jacob Marble
2009-09-18 21:19                     ` Jacob Marble
2009-09-19  7:59                       ` Andrew Lunn
2009-09-28  3:29                         ` Jacob Marble
2009-09-28  3:31                           ` Jacob Marble
2009-09-28  5:03                           ` Andrew Lunn
2009-09-28  6:12                             ` Jacob Marble
2009-09-29  5:06                               ` Jacob Marble
2009-09-29  5:25                                 ` Andrew Lunn
2009-09-29  9:19                                   ` Marek Lindner
2009-09-29 15:56                                     ` Jacob Marble
2009-09-29 16:14                                       ` Sven Eckelmann [this message]
2009-09-30  5:39                                         ` Jacob Marble
2009-09-30 19:27                                           ` Marek Lindner
2009-09-29 15:38                                   ` Jacob Marble
2009-08-30 19:55 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [patch] adding subgraph-feature to vis-output in dot-file-format Simon Wunderlich
2009-08-30 20:15   ` Andrew Lunn
2009-08-30 21:47   ` Linus Lüssing
2009-08-31  5:28     ` Andrew Lunn
2009-09-01 20:47   ` Linus Lüssing
2009-09-04 18:58     ` Linus Lüssing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200909291814.53591.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de \
    --to=sven.eckelmann@gmx.de \
    --cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).