b.a.t.m.a.n.lists.open-mesh.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 5/7] batman-adv: Make bat_priv->curr_gw an rcu protected pointer
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 14:18:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201102081418.38151.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1296832896-30081-6-git-send-email-linus.luessing@ascom.ch>


On Friday 04 February 2011 16:21:34 Linus Lüssing wrote:
> +	if (curr_gw) {
> +		rcu_read_unlock();
>  		return;
> +	}
> 
> -	rcu_read_lock();
>  	if (hlist_empty(&bat_priv->gw_list)) {
> -		rcu_read_unlock();
> 
> -		if (bat_priv->curr_gw) {
> +		if (curr_gw) {
> +			rcu_read_unlock();
>  			bat_dbg(DBG_BATMAN, bat_priv,
>  				"Removing selected gateway - "
>  				"no gateway in range\n");
>  			gw_deselect(bat_priv);
>  		}
> +		else
> +			rcu_read_unlock();

This is a bit odd here - we return if curr_gw is not NULL and later we print a 
message if curr_gw is not NULL ? 
The issue existed before your patch came along.


>  void gw_check_election(struct bat_priv *bat_priv, struct orig_node
> *orig_node) {
> -	struct gw_node *curr_gateway_tmp = bat_priv->curr_gw;
> +	struct gw_node *curr_gateway_tmp;
>  	uint8_t gw_tq_avg, orig_tq_avg;
> 
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	curr_gateway_tmp = rcu_dereference(bat_priv->curr_gw);
>  	if (!curr_gateway_tmp)
> -		return;
> +		goto rcu_unlock;
> 
>  	if (!curr_gateway_tmp->orig_node)
>  		goto deselect;

It seems if we jump to "deselect" here the rcu_lock() will never be unlocked.


> @@ -316,7 +342,7 @@ void gw_node_purge(struct bat_priv *bat_priv)
> -		if (bat_priv->curr_gw == gw_node)
> +		if (rcu_dereference(bat_priv->curr_gw) == gw_node)
>  			gw_deselect(bat_priv);

At this point we neither hold a rcu_lock() nor the newly created spinlock ...


>  	spinlock_t gw_list_lock; /* protects gw_list */
> +	spinlock_t curr_gw_lock; /* protects curr_gw updates */

Would speak anything against re-using the gw_list_lock ?

Regards,
Marek

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-08 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-30  1:52 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Reordered rcu refcounting Sven Eckelmann
2011-01-30  1:52 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 1/4] batman-adv: Correct rcu refcounting for gw_node Sven Eckelmann
2011-02-02 17:37   ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] " Linus Lüssing
2011-02-02 19:49     ` Marek Lindner
2011-02-02 20:43       ` Linus Lüssing
2011-02-02 21:42     ` Sven Eckelmann
2011-02-03  0:19       ` Marek Lindner
2011-02-03  9:55       ` Linus Lüssing
2011-02-03 10:01         ` Sven Eckelmann
2011-02-03 14:43     ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 1/3] " Linus Lüssing
2011-02-03 17:56       ` Sven Eckelmann
2011-02-03 14:43     ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 2/3] batman-adv: add __rcu annotations " Linus Lüssing
2011-02-03 14:43     ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 3/3] batman-adv: Increase orig_node refcount before releasing rcu read lock Linus Lüssing
2011-01-30  1:52 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 2/4] batman-adv: Correct rcu refcounting for softif_neigh Sven Eckelmann
2011-01-30  1:52 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 3/4] batman-adv: Correct rcu refcounting for batman_if Sven Eckelmann
2011-01-30  1:52 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 4/4] batman-adv: Correct rcu refcounting for neigh_node Sven Eckelmann
2011-01-30 15:20   ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv2 " Sven Eckelmann
2011-02-03 17:02 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Reordered rcu refcounting Marek Lindner
2011-02-03 17:03   ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 1/4] batman-adv: Correct rcu refcounting for gw_node Marek Lindner
2011-02-03 17:03   ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 2/4] batman-adv: Correct rcu refcounting for softif_neigh Marek Lindner
2011-02-03 17:03   ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 3/4] batman-adv: Correct rcu refcounting for batman_if Marek Lindner
2011-02-03 17:03   ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 4/4] batman-adv: Correct rcu refcounting for neigh_node Marek Lindner
2011-02-04 12:59     ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv2 " Marek Lindner
2011-02-04 15:21   ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Reordered rcu refcounting, v3 Linus Lüssing
2011-02-04 15:21   ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 1/7] batman-adv: Correct rcu refcounting for gw_node Linus Lüssing
2011-02-10 11:01     ` Linus Lüssing
2011-02-04 15:21   ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 2/7] batman-adv: Correct rcu refcounting for softif_neigh Linus Lüssing
2011-02-10 12:45     ` Linus Lüssing
2011-02-10 13:57       ` Marek Lindner
2011-02-12 21:23         ` Linus Lüssing
2011-02-04 15:21   ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 3/7] batman-adv: Correct rcu refcounting for batman_if Linus Lüssing
2011-02-04 15:21   ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 4/7] batman-adv: Correct rcu refcounting for neigh_node Linus Lüssing
2011-02-04 15:21   ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 5/7] batman-adv: Make bat_priv->curr_gw an rcu protected pointer Linus Lüssing
2011-02-08 13:18     ` Marek Lindner [this message]
2011-02-10 10:42       ` Linus Lüssing
2011-02-10 14:25         ` Marek Lindner
2011-02-12 21:21           ` Linus Lüssing
2011-02-12 21:21           ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv2 " Linus Lüssing
2011-02-13 21:09             ` Marek Lindner
2011-02-04 15:21   ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 6/7] batman-adv: add __rcu annotations for gw_node Linus Lüssing
2011-02-13 21:10     ` Marek Lindner
2011-02-04 15:21   ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 7/7] batman-adv: Increase orig_node refcount before releasing rcu read lock Linus Lüssing
2011-02-04 16:33     ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv2 " Linus Lüssing
2011-02-13 21:11     ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH " Marek Lindner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201102081418.38151.lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
    --to=lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
    --cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).