From: Marek Lindner <mareklindner@neomailbox.ch>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Patchwork on open-mesh.org
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 12:43:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2259545.lEtA3AoCDO@voltaire> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23488110.8Oiix784PY@sven-desktop>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1781 bytes --]
On Sunday, February 21, 2016 16:39:22 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> I've used my free time in the last week to look over the 5246 patches which
> were sent to the B.A.T.M.A.N. mailing list. These patches were categorized
> as
>
> * Accepted:
> committed to the respective repository at git.open-mesh.org
> * Rejected:
> Either rejected by the Maintainer(s) or withdrawn by the Author because
> they turned out to be a bad idea
> * RFC
> patches which were just posted to get comments
> * Not applicable
> patches which were not really for a repository at git.open-mesh.org
> (for example patches which are forwarded to net-next.git/net.git)
> * Changes requested
> Patch had flaws but these could be fixed but the author of the patch
> hasn't sent a new version of the patch
> * Superseded
> New version of the patch(set) was sent which makes the old version
> obsolete
>
> The result can now be found at https://patchwork.open-mesh.org/
Thanks a lot for doing all this cleanup work! I doubt any mere mortal could
have reviewed the state for 5000+ patches on a rainy weekend .. :-)
A few questions as to how this works:
* [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add patchwork URL for BATMAN ADVANCED
-> Manually marked as 'accepted' as it won't be easily detectable as merged.
Correct ?
* [B.A.T.M.A.N.,2/2] batman-adv: Split batadv_iv_ogm_orig_del_if function
-> Merged patch today but still shows up in patchwork. Should we wait for the
auto-detection or did I do something wrong ?
* [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv: Fix integer overflow in batadv_iv_ogm_calc_tq
-> Marked as opened but has been superseded by '[B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH]
batman-adv: Fix integer overflow in batadv_iv_ogm_calc_tq' that was merged
today ? Shall I mark as 'accepted' ?
Thanks,
Marek
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-28 4:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-21 15:39 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Patchwork on open-mesh.org Sven Eckelmann
2016-02-21 15:40 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add patchwork URL for BATMAN ADVANCED Sven Eckelmann
2016-02-27 21:10 ` Antonio Quartulli
2016-02-28 4:43 ` Marek Lindner [this message]
2016-02-28 6:21 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Patchwork on open-mesh.org Sven Eckelmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2259545.lEtA3AoCDO@voltaire \
--to=mareklindner@neomailbox.ch \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).