On Sunday, 9 June 2019 12:19:22 CEST René Treffer wrote:
> @@ -107,10 +107,25 @@ static u32 batadv_v_elp_get_throughput(struct batadv_hardif_neigh_node *neigh)
>                 }
>                 if (ret)
>                         goto default_throughput;
> -               if (!(sinfo.filled & BIT(NL80211_STA_INFO_EXPECTED_THROUGHPUT)))
> -                       goto default_throughput;
>  
> -               return sinfo.expected_throughput / 100;
> +               if (sinfo.filled & BIT(NL80211_STA_INFO_EXPECTED_THROUGHPUT)) {
> +                       return sinfo.expected_throughput / 100;
> +               }
> +
> +               // try to estimate en expected throughput based on reported rx/tx rates
> +               // 1/3 of tx or 1/3 of the average of rx and tx, whichever is smaller
> +               if (sinfo.filled & BIT(NL80211_STA_INFO_TX_BITRATE)) {
> +                       tx = cfg80211_calculate_bitrate(&sinfo.txrate);
> +                       if (sinfo.filled & BIT(NL80211_STA_INFO_RX_BITRATE)) {
> +                               rx = cfg80211_calculate_bitrate(&sinfo.rxrate);
> +                               if (rx < tx) {
> +                                       return (rx + tx) / 6;
> +                               }
> +                       }
> +                       return tx / 3;
> +               }
> +
> +               goto default_throughput;
>         }
>  
>         /* if not a wifi interface, check if this device provides data via
> -- 
> 2.20.1

No, we are not interested in rx rate for tx throughput estimations.

Kind regards,
	Sven