Hi André, On 04/06/14 21:53, André Gaul wrote: > This patch removes unnecessary logspam which resulted from superfluous > calls to net_ratelimit(). With the supplied patch, net_ratelimit() is > called after the loglevel has been checked. good catch! > -#define batadv_dbg(type, bat_priv, fmt, arg...) \ > +/* possibly ratelimited debug output */ > +#define _batadv_dbg(type, bat_priv, ratelimited, fmt, arg...) \ can you please put the ending "\" at the same position of the ones below ? (This way the entire macro definition looks better). > do { \ > - if (atomic_read(&bat_priv->log_level) & type) \ > + if (atomic_read(&bat_priv->log_level) & type && \ > + (!ratelimited || net_ratelimit())) \ same here > batadv_debug_log(bat_priv, fmt, ## arg);\ > } \ > while (0) > #else /* !CONFIG_BATMAN_ADV_DEBUG */ > -__printf(3, 4) > -static inline void batadv_dbg(int type __always_unused, > +__printf(4, 5) > +static inline void _batadv_dbg(int type __always_unused, > struct batadv_priv *bat_priv __always_unused, > + int ratelimited __always_unused, > const char *fmt __always_unused, ...) > { > } > #endif > > +#define batadv_dbg(type, bat_priv, arg...) \ > + _batadv_dbg(type, bat_priv, 0, ## arg) > +#define batadv_dbg_ratelimited(type, bat_priv, arg...) \ > + _batadv_dbg(type, bat_priv, 1, ## arg) > + > #define batadv_info(net_dev, fmt, arg...) \ > do { \ > struct net_device *_netdev = (net_dev); \ > diff --git a/routing.c b/routing.c > index 3514153..c679c6f 100644 > --- a/routing.c > +++ b/routing.c > @@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ static int batadv_check_unicast_ttvn(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv, > if (batadv_tt_local_client_is_roaming(bat_priv, ethhdr->h_dest, vid)) { > if (batadv_reroute_unicast_packet(bat_priv, unicast_packet, > ethhdr->h_dest, vid)) > - net_ratelimited_function(batadv_dbg, BATADV_DBG_TT, > + batadv_dbg_ratelimited(BATADV_DBG_TT, > bat_priv, > "Rerouting unicast packet to %pM (dst=%pM): Local Roaming\n", > unicast_packet->dest, The arguments on a new line must be lined up to the first column after the opening parenthesis. (I think that checkpatch would have suggested the same) > @@ -752,7 +752,7 @@ static int batadv_check_unicast_ttvn(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv, > */ > if (batadv_reroute_unicast_packet(bat_priv, unicast_packet, > ethhdr->h_dest, vid)) { > - net_ratelimited_function(batadv_dbg, BATADV_DBG_TT, bat_priv, > + batadv_dbg_ratelimited(BATADV_DBG_TT, bat_priv, > "Rerouting unicast packet to %pM (dst=%pM): TTVN mismatch old_ttvn=%u new_ttvn=%u\n", > unicast_packet->dest, ethhdr->h_dest, > old_ttvn, curr_ttvn); same here. The rest looks good! -- Antonio Quartulli