From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com> To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, Marek Majkowski <marek@cloudflare.com>, Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>, Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/5] bpf: Support chain calling multiple BPF programs after each other Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 19:20:36 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <157046883614.2092443.9861796174814370924.stgit@alrua-x1> (raw) In-Reply-To: <157046883502.2092443.146052429591277809.stgit@alrua-x1> From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> This adds support for wrapping eBPF program dispatch in chain calling logic. The code injection is controlled by a flag at program load time; if the flag is set, the BPF program will carry a flag bit that changes the program dispatch logic to wrap it in a chain call loop. Ideally, it shouldn't be necessary to set the flag on program load time, but rather inject the calls when a chain call program is first loaded. The allocation logic sets the whole of struct bpf_prog to be read-only memory, so it can't immediately be modified, but conceivably we could just unlock the first page of the struct and flip the bit when a chain call program is first attached. Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> --- include/linux/bpf.h | 3 +++ include/linux/filter.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 6 ++++++ kernel/bpf/core.c | 6 ++++++ kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 4 +++- 5 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index 5b9d22338606..13e5f38cf5c6 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h @@ -365,6 +365,8 @@ struct bpf_prog_stats { struct u64_stats_sync syncp; }; +#define BPF_NUM_CHAIN_SLOTS 8 + struct bpf_prog_aux { atomic_t refcnt; u32 used_map_cnt; @@ -383,6 +385,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux { struct list_head ksym_lnode; const struct bpf_prog_ops *ops; struct bpf_map **used_maps; + struct bpf_prog *chain_progs[BPF_NUM_CHAIN_SLOTS]; struct bpf_prog *prog; struct user_struct *user; u64 load_time; /* ns since boottime */ diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h index 2ce57645f3cd..3d1e4991e61d 100644 --- a/include/linux/filter.h +++ b/include/linux/filter.h @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ #include <linux/kallsyms.h> #include <linux/if_vlan.h> #include <linux/vmalloc.h> +#include <linux/nospec.h> #include <net/sch_generic.h> @@ -528,6 +529,7 @@ struct bpf_prog { is_func:1, /* program is a bpf function */ kprobe_override:1, /* Do we override a kprobe? */ has_callchain_buf:1, /* callchain buffer allocated? */ + chain_calls:1, /* should this use the chain_call wrapper */ enforce_expected_attach_type:1; /* Enforce expected_attach_type checking at attach time */ enum bpf_prog_type type; /* Type of BPF program */ enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type; /* For some prog types */ @@ -551,6 +553,30 @@ struct sk_filter { struct bpf_prog *prog; }; +#define BPF_MAX_CHAIN_CALLS 32 +static __always_inline unsigned int do_chain_calls(const struct bpf_prog *prog, + const void *ctx) +{ + int i = BPF_MAX_CHAIN_CALLS; + int idx; + u32 ret; + + do { + ret = (*(prog)->bpf_func)(ctx, prog->insnsi); + + if (ret + 1 >= BPF_NUM_CHAIN_SLOTS) { + prog = prog->aux->chain_progs[0]; + continue; + } + idx = ret + 1; + idx = array_index_nospec(idx, BPF_NUM_CHAIN_SLOTS); + + prog = prog->aux->chain_progs[idx] ?: prog->aux->chain_progs[0]; + } while (prog && --i); + + return ret; +} + DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(bpf_stats_enabled_key); #define BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, ctx) ({ \ @@ -559,14 +585,18 @@ DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(bpf_stats_enabled_key); if (static_branch_unlikely(&bpf_stats_enabled_key)) { \ struct bpf_prog_stats *stats; \ u64 start = sched_clock(); \ - ret = (*(prog)->bpf_func)(ctx, (prog)->insnsi); \ + ret = prog->chain_calls ? \ + do_chain_calls(prog, ctx) : \ + (*(prog)->bpf_func)(ctx, (prog)->insnsi); \ stats = this_cpu_ptr(prog->aux->stats); \ u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->syncp); \ stats->cnt++; \ stats->nsecs += sched_clock() - start; \ u64_stats_update_end(&stats->syncp); \ } else { \ - ret = (*(prog)->bpf_func)(ctx, (prog)->insnsi); \ + ret = prog->chain_calls ? \ + do_chain_calls(prog, ctx) : \ + (*(prog)->bpf_func)(ctx, (prog)->insnsi); \ } \ ret; }) diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index 77c6be96d676..1ce80a227be3 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -288,6 +288,12 @@ enum bpf_attach_type { /* The verifier internal test flag. Behavior is undefined */ #define BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ (1U << 3) +/* Whether to enable chain call logic at program execution. If set, the program + * execution logic will check for and jump to chain call programs configured + * with the BPF_PROG_CHAIN_* commands to the bpf syscall. + */ +#define BPF_F_CHAIN_CALLS (1U << 4) + /* When BPF ldimm64's insn[0].src_reg != 0 then this can have * two extensions: * diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index 66088a9e9b9e..5dfe3585bc5d 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -254,6 +254,12 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_realloc(struct bpf_prog *fp_old, unsigned int size, void __bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog *fp) { if (fp->aux) { + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < BPF_NUM_CHAIN_SLOTS; i++) + if (fp->aux->chain_progs[i]) + bpf_prog_put(fp->aux->chain_progs[i]); + free_percpu(fp->aux->stats); kfree(fp->aux); } diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 82eabd4e38ad..b8a203a05881 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -1630,7 +1630,8 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr) if (attr->prog_flags & ~(BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT | BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT | BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ | - BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32)) + BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 | + BPF_F_CHAIN_CALLS)) return -EINVAL; if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && @@ -1665,6 +1666,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr) return -ENOMEM; prog->expected_attach_type = attr->expected_attach_type; + prog->chain_calls = !!(attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_CHAIN_CALLS); prog->aux->offload_requested = !!attr->prog_ifindex;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-07 17:20 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-10-07 17:20 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/5] xdp: Support multiple programs on a single interface through chain calls Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-07 17:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message] 2019-10-07 20:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/5] bpf: Support chain calling multiple BPF programs after each other Alexei Starovoitov 2019-10-08 8:07 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-09 1:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-10-09 8:03 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-10 4:41 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-10-14 12:35 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-14 17:08 ` John Fastabend 2019-10-14 18:48 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-15 16:30 ` Edward Cree 2019-10-15 16:42 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-15 18:33 ` Edward Cree 2019-10-17 12:11 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-22 17:27 ` Edward Cree 2019-10-22 18:07 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-11-12 2:51 ` static and dynamic linking. Was: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/5] bpf: Support chain calling multiple BPF Alexei Starovoitov 2019-11-12 16:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-11-12 19:52 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-11-12 21:25 ` Edward Cree 2019-11-12 23:18 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-11-13 18:30 ` Edward Cree 2019-11-13 18:51 ` Andrii Nakryiko 2019-11-15 2:13 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-11-15 16:56 ` John Fastabend 2019-11-12 23:25 ` John Fastabend 2019-11-13 0:21 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-11-13 5:33 ` John Fastabend 2019-11-15 1:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-11-15 16:39 ` John Fastabend 2019-11-14 15:41 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-11-12 16:32 ` Edward Cree 2019-11-15 11:48 ` Lorenz Bauer 2019-11-15 23:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-11-18 13:29 ` Lorenz Bauer 2019-10-21 23:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/5] bpf: Support chain calling multiple BPF programs after each other Edward Cree 2019-10-16 2:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-10-16 8:27 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2019-10-16 10:35 ` Daniel Borkmann 2019-10-16 11:16 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-16 13:51 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-19 20:09 ` bpf indirect calls Alexei Starovoitov 2019-10-20 10:58 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-25 16:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-10-27 12:15 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-09 10:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/5] bpf: Support chain calling multiple BPF programs after each other Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2019-10-09 17:57 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-10-07 17:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/5] bpf: Add support for setting chain call sequence for programs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-07 20:38 ` Daniel Borkmann 2019-10-08 8:09 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-07 17:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/5] tools: Update bpf.h header for program chain calls Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-07 17:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/5] libbpf: Add syscall wrappers for BPF_PROG_CHAIN_* commands Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-07 17:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 5/5] selftests: Add tests for XDP chain calls Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-07 18:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/5] xdp: Support multiple programs on a single interface through " John Fastabend 2019-10-08 8:42 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=157046883614.2092443.9861796174814370924.stgit@alrua-x1 \ --to=toke@redhat.com \ --cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \ --cc=ast@kernel.org \ --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=brouer@redhat.com \ --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=kafai@fb.com \ --cc=lmb@cloudflare.com \ --cc=marek@cloudflare.com \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \ --cc=yhs@fb.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/5] bpf: Support chain calling multiple BPF programs after each other' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).