From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com> To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, Marek Majkowski <marek@cloudflare.com>, Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>, Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/5] bpf: Add support for setting chain call sequence for programs Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 19:20:37 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <157046883723.2092443.3902769602513209987.stgit@alrua-x1> (raw) In-Reply-To: <157046883502.2092443.146052429591277809.stgit@alrua-x1> From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> This adds support for setting and deleting bpf chain call programs through a couple of new commands in the bpf() syscall. The CHAIN_ADD and CHAIN_DEL commands take two eBPF program fds and a return code, and install the 'next' program to be chain called after the 'prev' program if that program returns 'retcode'. A retcode of -1 means "wildcard", so that the program will be executed regardless of the previous program's return code. The syscall command names are based on Alexei's prog_chain example[0], which Alan helpfully rebased on current bpf-next. However, the logic and program storage is obviously adapted to the execution logic in the previous commit. [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ast/bpf.git/commit/?h=prog_chain&id=f54f45d00f91e083f6aec2abe35b6f0be52ae85b&context=15 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> --- include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 10 ++++++ kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index 1ce80a227be3..b03c23963af8 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -107,6 +107,9 @@ enum bpf_cmd { BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_ELEM, BPF_MAP_FREEZE, BPF_BTF_GET_NEXT_ID, + BPF_PROG_CHAIN_ADD, + BPF_PROG_CHAIN_DEL, + BPF_PROG_CHAIN_GET, }; enum bpf_map_type { @@ -516,6 +519,13 @@ union bpf_attr { __u64 probe_offset; /* output: probe_offset */ __u64 probe_addr; /* output: probe_addr */ } task_fd_query; + + struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_PROG_CHAIN_* commands */ + __u32 prev_prog_fd; + __u32 next_prog_fd; + __u32 retcode; + __u32 next_prog_id; /* output: prog_id */ + }; } __attribute__((aligned(8))); /* The description below is an attempt at providing documentation to eBPF diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index b8a203a05881..be8112e08a88 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -2113,6 +2113,79 @@ static int bpf_prog_test_run(const union bpf_attr *attr, return ret; } +#define BPF_PROG_CHAIN_LAST_FIELD next_prog_id + +static int bpf_prog_chain(int cmd, const union bpf_attr *attr, + union bpf_attr __user *uattr) +{ + struct bpf_prog *prog, *next_prog, *old_prog; + struct bpf_prog **array; + int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; + u32 index, prog_id; + + if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_PROG_CHAIN)) + return -EINVAL; + + /* Index 0 is wildcard, encoded as ~0 by userspace */ + if (attr->retcode == ((u32) ~0)) + index = 0; + else + index = attr->retcode + 1; + + if (index >= BPF_NUM_CHAIN_SLOTS) + return -E2BIG; + + prog = bpf_prog_get(attr->prev_prog_fd); + if (IS_ERR(prog)) + return PTR_ERR(prog); + + /* If the chain_calls bit is not set, that's because the chain call flag + * was not set on program load, and so we can't support chain calls. + */ + if (!prog->chain_calls) + goto out; + + array = prog->aux->chain_progs; + + switch (cmd) { + case BPF_PROG_CHAIN_ADD: + next_prog = bpf_prog_get(attr->next_prog_fd); + if (IS_ERR(next_prog)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(next_prog); + break; + } + old_prog = xchg(array + index, next_prog); + if (old_prog) + bpf_prog_put(old_prog); + ret = 0; + break; + case BPF_PROG_CHAIN_DEL: + old_prog = xchg(array + index, NULL); + if (old_prog) { + bpf_prog_put(old_prog); + ret = 0; + } else { + ret = -ENOENT; + } + break; + case BPF_PROG_CHAIN_GET: + old_prog = READ_ONCE(array[index]); + if (old_prog) { + prog_id = old_prog->aux->id; + if (put_user(prog_id, &uattr->next_prog_id)) + ret = -EFAULT; + else + ret = 0; + } else + ret = -ENOENT; + break; + } + +out: + bpf_prog_put(prog); + return ret; +} + #define BPF_OBJ_GET_NEXT_ID_LAST_FIELD next_id static int bpf_obj_get_next_id(const union bpf_attr *attr, @@ -2885,6 +2958,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(bpf, int, cmd, union bpf_attr __user *, uattr, unsigned int, siz case BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN: err = bpf_prog_test_run(&attr, uattr); break; + case BPF_PROG_CHAIN_ADD: + case BPF_PROG_CHAIN_DEL: + case BPF_PROG_CHAIN_GET: + err = bpf_prog_chain(cmd, &attr, uattr); + break; case BPF_PROG_GET_NEXT_ID: err = bpf_obj_get_next_id(&attr, uattr, &prog_idr, &prog_idr_lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-07 17:20 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-10-07 17:20 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/5] xdp: Support multiple programs on a single interface through chain calls Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-07 17:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/5] bpf: Support chain calling multiple BPF programs after each other Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-07 20:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-10-08 8:07 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-09 1:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-10-09 8:03 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-10 4:41 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-10-14 12:35 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-14 17:08 ` John Fastabend 2019-10-14 18:48 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-15 16:30 ` Edward Cree 2019-10-15 16:42 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-15 18:33 ` Edward Cree 2019-10-17 12:11 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-22 17:27 ` Edward Cree 2019-10-22 18:07 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-11-12 2:51 ` static and dynamic linking. Was: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/5] bpf: Support chain calling multiple BPF Alexei Starovoitov 2019-11-12 16:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-11-12 19:52 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-11-12 21:25 ` Edward Cree 2019-11-12 23:18 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-11-13 18:30 ` Edward Cree 2019-11-13 18:51 ` Andrii Nakryiko 2019-11-15 2:13 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-11-15 16:56 ` John Fastabend 2019-11-12 23:25 ` John Fastabend 2019-11-13 0:21 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-11-13 5:33 ` John Fastabend 2019-11-15 1:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-11-15 16:39 ` John Fastabend 2019-11-14 15:41 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-11-12 16:32 ` Edward Cree 2019-11-15 11:48 ` Lorenz Bauer 2019-11-15 23:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-11-18 13:29 ` Lorenz Bauer 2019-10-21 23:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/5] bpf: Support chain calling multiple BPF programs after each other Edward Cree 2019-10-16 2:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-10-16 8:27 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2019-10-16 10:35 ` Daniel Borkmann 2019-10-16 11:16 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-16 13:51 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-19 20:09 ` bpf indirect calls Alexei Starovoitov 2019-10-20 10:58 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-25 16:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-10-27 12:15 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-09 10:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/5] bpf: Support chain calling multiple BPF programs after each other Jesper Dangaard Brouer 2019-10-09 17:57 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2019-10-07 17:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message] 2019-10-07 20:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/5] bpf: Add support for setting chain call sequence for programs Daniel Borkmann 2019-10-08 8:09 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-07 17:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/5] tools: Update bpf.h header for program chain calls Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-07 17:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/5] libbpf: Add syscall wrappers for BPF_PROG_CHAIN_* commands Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-07 17:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 5/5] selftests: Add tests for XDP chain calls Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 2019-10-07 18:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/5] xdp: Support multiple programs on a single interface through " John Fastabend 2019-10-08 8:42 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=157046883723.2092443.3902769602513209987.stgit@alrua-x1 \ --to=toke@redhat.com \ --cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \ --cc=ast@kernel.org \ --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=brouer@redhat.com \ --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=kafai@fb.com \ --cc=lmb@cloudflare.com \ --cc=marek@cloudflare.com \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \ --cc=yhs@fb.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/5] bpf: Add support for setting chain call sequence for programs' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).