bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
To: magnus.karlsson@intel.com, bjorn.topel@intel.com, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	jonathan.lemon@gmail.com, maximmi@mellanox.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
	anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com,
	maciejromanfijalkowski@gmail.com, cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 06/15] xsk: move xsk_tx_list and its lock to buffer pool
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:26:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1598603189-32145-7-git-send-email-magnus.karlsson@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1598603189-32145-1-git-send-email-magnus.karlsson@intel.com>

Move the xsk_tx_list and the xsk_tx_list_lock from the umem to
the buffer pool. This so that we in a later commit can share the
umem between multiple HW queues. There is one xsk_tx_list per
device and queue id, so it should be located in the buffer pool.

Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
---
 include/net/xdp_sock.h      |  4 +---
 include/net/xsk_buff_pool.h |  5 +++++
 net/xdp/xdp_umem.c          | 26 --------------------------
 net/xdp/xdp_umem.h          |  2 --
 net/xdp/xsk.c               | 15 ++++++---------
 net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c     | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/xdp_sock.h b/include/net/xdp_sock.h
index b052f1c..9a61d05 100644
--- a/include/net/xdp_sock.h
+++ b/include/net/xdp_sock.h
@@ -29,8 +29,6 @@ struct xdp_umem {
 	u8 flags;
 	int id;
 	bool zc;
-	spinlock_t xsk_tx_list_lock;
-	struct list_head xsk_tx_list;
 };
 
 struct xsk_map {
@@ -57,7 +55,7 @@ struct xdp_sock {
 	/* Protects multiple processes in the control path */
 	struct mutex mutex;
 	struct xsk_queue *tx ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
-	struct list_head list;
+	struct list_head tx_list;
 	/* Mutual exclusion of NAPI TX thread and sendmsg error paths
 	 * in the SKB destructor callback.
 	 */
diff --git a/include/net/xsk_buff_pool.h b/include/net/xsk_buff_pool.h
index 2d94890..83f100c 100644
--- a/include/net/xsk_buff_pool.h
+++ b/include/net/xsk_buff_pool.h
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ struct xsk_buff_pool {
 	void *addrs;
 	struct device *dev;
 	struct net_device *netdev;
+	struct list_head xsk_tx_list;
+	/* Protects modifications to the xsk_tx_list */
+	spinlock_t xsk_tx_list_lock;
 	refcount_t users;
 	struct work_struct work;
 	struct xdp_buff_xsk *free_heads[];
@@ -67,6 +70,8 @@ void xp_release(struct xdp_buff_xsk *xskb);
 void xp_get_pool(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool);
 void xp_put_pool(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool);
 void xp_clear_dev(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool);
+void xp_add_xsk(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, struct xdp_sock *xs);
+void xp_del_xsk(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, struct xdp_sock *xs);
 
 /* AF_XDP, and XDP core. */
 void xp_free(struct xdp_buff_xsk *xskb);
diff --git a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
index 3e612fc..7751592 100644
--- a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
+++ b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
@@ -23,30 +23,6 @@
 
 static DEFINE_IDA(umem_ida);
 
-void xdp_add_sk_umem(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_sock *xs)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	if (!xs->tx)
-		return;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&umem->xsk_tx_list_lock, flags);
-	list_add_rcu(&xs->list, &umem->xsk_tx_list);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&umem->xsk_tx_list_lock, flags);
-}
-
-void xdp_del_sk_umem(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_sock *xs)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	if (!xs->tx)
-		return;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&umem->xsk_tx_list_lock, flags);
-	list_del_rcu(&xs->list);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&umem->xsk_tx_list_lock, flags);
-}
-
 static void xdp_umem_unpin_pages(struct xdp_umem *umem)
 {
 	unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock(umem->pgs, umem->npgs, true);
@@ -205,8 +181,6 @@ static int xdp_umem_reg(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_umem_reg *mr)
 	umem->pgs = NULL;
 	umem->user = NULL;
 	umem->flags = mr->flags;
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&umem->xsk_tx_list);
-	spin_lock_init(&umem->xsk_tx_list_lock);
 
 	refcount_set(&umem->users, 1);
 
diff --git a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.h b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.h
index 67bf3f3..181fdda 100644
--- a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.h
+++ b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.h
@@ -10,8 +10,6 @@
 
 void xdp_get_umem(struct xdp_umem *umem);
 void xdp_put_umem(struct xdp_umem *umem);
-void xdp_add_sk_umem(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_sock *xs);
-void xdp_del_sk_umem(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_sock *xs);
 struct xdp_umem *xdp_umem_create(struct xdp_umem_reg *mr);
 
 #endif /* XDP_UMEM_H_ */
diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c
index 9f1b906e..067e854 100644
--- a/net/xdp/xsk.c
+++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c
@@ -51,14 +51,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(xsk_set_rx_need_wakeup);
 
 void xsk_set_tx_need_wakeup(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool)
 {
-	struct xdp_umem *umem = pool->umem;
 	struct xdp_sock *xs;
 
 	if (pool->cached_need_wakeup & XDP_WAKEUP_TX)
 		return;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(xs, &umem->xsk_tx_list, list) {
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(xs, &pool->xsk_tx_list, tx_list) {
 		xs->tx->ring->flags |= XDP_RING_NEED_WAKEUP;
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -79,14 +78,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(xsk_clear_rx_need_wakeup);
 
 void xsk_clear_tx_need_wakeup(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool)
 {
-	struct xdp_umem *umem = pool->umem;
 	struct xdp_sock *xs;
 
 	if (!(pool->cached_need_wakeup & XDP_WAKEUP_TX))
 		return;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(xs, &umem->xsk_tx_list, list) {
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(xs, &pool->xsk_tx_list, tx_list) {
 		xs->tx->ring->flags &= ~XDP_RING_NEED_WAKEUP;
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -302,7 +300,7 @@ void xsk_tx_release(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool)
 	struct xdp_sock *xs;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(xs, &pool->umem->xsk_tx_list, list) {
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(xs, &pool->xsk_tx_list, tx_list) {
 		__xskq_cons_release(xs->tx);
 		xs->sk.sk_write_space(&xs->sk);
 	}
@@ -312,11 +310,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(xsk_tx_release);
 
 bool xsk_tx_peek_desc(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, struct xdp_desc *desc)
 {
-	struct xdp_umem *umem = pool->umem;
 	struct xdp_sock *xs;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(xs, &umem->xsk_tx_list, list) {
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(xs, &pool->xsk_tx_list, tx_list) {
 		if (!xskq_cons_peek_desc(xs->tx, desc, pool)) {
 			xs->tx->queue_empty_descs++;
 			continue;
@@ -524,7 +521,7 @@ static void xsk_unbind_dev(struct xdp_sock *xs)
 	WRITE_ONCE(xs->state, XSK_UNBOUND);
 
 	/* Wait for driver to stop using the xdp socket. */
-	xdp_del_sk_umem(xs->umem, xs);
+	xp_del_xsk(xs->pool, xs);
 	xs->dev = NULL;
 	synchronize_net();
 	dev_put(dev);
@@ -744,7 +741,7 @@ static int xsk_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, int addr_len)
 	xs->dev = dev;
 	xs->zc = xs->umem->zc;
 	xs->queue_id = qid;
-	xdp_add_sk_umem(xs->umem, xs);
+	xp_add_xsk(xs->pool, xs);
 
 out_unlock:
 	if (err) {
diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
index 436648a..dbd913e 100644
--- a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
+++ b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
@@ -11,6 +11,30 @@
 #include "xdp_umem.h"
 #include "xsk.h"
 
+void xp_add_xsk(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, struct xdp_sock *xs)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	if (!xs->tx)
+		return;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&pool->xsk_tx_list_lock, flags);
+	list_add_rcu(&xs->tx_list, &pool->xsk_tx_list);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pool->xsk_tx_list_lock, flags);
+}
+
+void xp_del_xsk(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, struct xdp_sock *xs)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	if (!xs->tx)
+		return;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&pool->xsk_tx_list_lock, flags);
+	list_del_rcu(&xs->tx_list);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pool->xsk_tx_list_lock, flags);
+}
+
 static void xp_addr_unmap(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool)
 {
 	vunmap(pool->addrs);
@@ -63,6 +87,8 @@ struct xsk_buff_pool *xp_create_and_assign_umem(struct xdp_sock *xs,
 		XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM;
 	pool->umem = umem;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->free_list);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->xsk_tx_list);
+	spin_lock_init(&pool->xsk_tx_list_lock);
 	refcount_set(&pool->users, 1);
 
 	pool->fq = xs->fq_tmp;
-- 
2.7.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-28  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-28  8:26 [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/15] xsk: support shared umems between devices and queues Magnus Karlsson
2020-08-28  8:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/15] xsk: i40e: ice: ixgbe: mlx5: pass buffer pool to driver instead of umem Magnus Karlsson
2020-08-28  8:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 02/15] xsk: i40e: ice: ixgbe: mlx5: rename xsk zero-copy driver interfaces Magnus Karlsson
2020-08-28  8:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 03/15] xsk: create and free buffer pool independently from umem Magnus Karlsson
2020-10-05  8:35   ` please revert " Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-05  8:43     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-05  8:47       ` Björn Töpel
2020-08-28  8:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 04/15] xsk: move fill and completion rings to buffer pool Magnus Karlsson
2020-08-28  8:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 05/15] xsk: move queue_id, dev and need_wakeup " Magnus Karlsson
2020-08-28  8:26 ` Magnus Karlsson [this message]
2020-08-28  8:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/15] xsk: move addrs from buffer pool to umem Magnus Karlsson
2020-08-28  8:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 08/15] xsk: enable sharing of dma mappings Magnus Karlsson
2020-08-28  8:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 09/15] xsk: rearrange internal structs for better performance Magnus Karlsson
2020-08-28  8:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 10/15] xsk: i40e: ice: ixgbe: mlx5: test for dma_need_sync earlier " Magnus Karlsson
2020-08-28  8:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 11/15] xsk: add shared umem support between queue ids Magnus Karlsson
2020-08-28  8:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 12/15] xsk: add shared umem support between devices Magnus Karlsson
2020-08-28  8:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 13/15] libbpf: support shared umems between queues and devices Magnus Karlsson
2020-08-28  8:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 14/15] samples/bpf: add new sample xsk_fwd.c Magnus Karlsson
2020-08-28  8:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 15/15] xsk: documentation for XDP_SHARED_UMEM between queues and netdevs Magnus Karlsson
2020-08-31 20:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/15] xsk: support shared umems between devices and queues Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1598603189-32145-7-git-send-email-magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --to=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=maciejromanfijalkowski@gmail.com \
    --cc=maximmi@mellanox.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).