bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>
To: magnus.karlsson@intel.com, bjorn.topel@intel.com, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	jonathan.lemon@gmail.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
	anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com,
	maciejromanfijalkowski@gmail.com,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 6/6] i40e: use batched xsk Tx interfaces to increase performance
Date: Wed,  4 Nov 2020 15:09:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1604498942-24274-7-git-send-email-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1604498942-24274-1-git-send-email-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>

From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>

Use the new batched xsk interfaces for the Tx path in the i40e driver
to improve performance. On my machine, this yields a throughput
increase of 4% for the l2fwd sample app in xdpsock. If we instead just
look at the Tx part, this patch set increases throughput with above
20% for Tx.

Note that I had to explicitly loop unroll the inner loop to get to
this performance level, by using a pragma. It is honored by both clang
and gcc and should be ignored by versions that do not support
it. Using the -funroll-loops compiler command line switch on the
source file resulted in a loop unrolling on a higher level that
lead to a performance decrease instead of an increase.

Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c |   2 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c    |   4 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c    |  14 ++-
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.h    |   3 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c     | 127 ++++++++++++++++++-------
 5 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c
index 26ba1f3..dc34867 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c
@@ -2025,7 +2025,7 @@ static int i40e_set_ringparam(struct net_device *netdev,
 			 */
 			tx_rings[i].desc = NULL;
 			tx_rings[i].rx_bi = NULL;
-			err = i40e_setup_tx_descriptors(&tx_rings[i]);
+			err = i40e_setup_tx_descriptors(&tx_rings[i], false);
 			if (err) {
 				while (i) {
 					i--;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
index 4f8a2154..c93774a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
@@ -3030,13 +3030,13 @@ static int i40e_vsi_setup_tx_resources(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
 	int i, err = 0;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < vsi->num_queue_pairs && !err; i++)
-		err = i40e_setup_tx_descriptors(vsi->tx_rings[i]);
+		err = i40e_setup_tx_descriptors(vsi->tx_rings[i], false);
 
 	if (!i40e_enabled_xdp_vsi(vsi))
 		return err;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < vsi->num_queue_pairs && !err; i++)
-		err = i40e_setup_tx_descriptors(vsi->xdp_rings[i]);
+		err = i40e_setup_tx_descriptors(vsi->xdp_rings[i], true);
 
 	return err;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
index d43ce13..3e13e0e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
@@ -676,6 +676,8 @@ void i40e_free_tx_resources(struct i40e_ring *tx_ring)
 	i40e_clean_tx_ring(tx_ring);
 	kfree(tx_ring->tx_bi);
 	tx_ring->tx_bi = NULL;
+	kfree(tx_ring->xsk_descs);
+	tx_ring->xsk_descs = NULL;
 
 	if (tx_ring->desc) {
 		dma_free_coherent(tx_ring->dev, tx_ring->size,
@@ -1259,10 +1261,11 @@ void i40e_clean_programming_status(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, u64 qword0_raw,
 /**
  * i40e_setup_tx_descriptors - Allocate the Tx descriptors
  * @tx_ring: the tx ring to set up
+ * @xdp_ring: true if this is an XDP Tx ring
  *
  * Return 0 on success, negative on error
  **/
-int i40e_setup_tx_descriptors(struct i40e_ring *tx_ring)
+int i40e_setup_tx_descriptors(struct i40e_ring *tx_ring, bool xdp_ring)
 {
 	struct device *dev = tx_ring->dev;
 	int bi_size;
@@ -1277,6 +1280,13 @@ int i40e_setup_tx_descriptors(struct i40e_ring *tx_ring)
 	if (!tx_ring->tx_bi)
 		goto err;
 
+	if (xdp_ring) {
+		tx_ring->xsk_descs = kcalloc(I40E_MAX_NUM_DESCRIPTORS, sizeof(*tx_ring->xsk_descs),
+					     GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!tx_ring->xsk_descs)
+			goto err;
+	}
+
 	u64_stats_init(&tx_ring->syncp);
 
 	/* round up to nearest 4K */
@@ -1300,6 +1310,8 @@ int i40e_setup_tx_descriptors(struct i40e_ring *tx_ring)
 	return 0;
 
 err:
+	kfree(tx_ring->xsk_descs);
+	tx_ring->xsk_descs = NULL;
 	kfree(tx_ring->tx_bi);
 	tx_ring->tx_bi = NULL;
 	return -ENOMEM;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.h
index 2feed92..628d5d7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.h
@@ -389,6 +389,7 @@ struct i40e_ring {
 	struct i40e_channel *ch;
 	struct xdp_rxq_info xdp_rxq;
 	struct xsk_buff_pool *xsk_pool;
+	struct xdp_desc *xsk_descs;      /* For storing descriptors in the AF_XDP ZC path */
 } ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
 
 static inline bool ring_uses_build_skb(struct i40e_ring *ring)
@@ -451,7 +452,7 @@ bool i40e_alloc_rx_buffers(struct i40e_ring *rxr, u16 cleaned_count);
 netdev_tx_t i40e_lan_xmit_frame(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev);
 void i40e_clean_tx_ring(struct i40e_ring *tx_ring);
 void i40e_clean_rx_ring(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring);
-int i40e_setup_tx_descriptors(struct i40e_ring *tx_ring);
+int i40e_setup_tx_descriptors(struct i40e_ring *tx_ring, bool xdp_ring);
 int i40e_setup_rx_descriptors(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring);
 void i40e_free_tx_resources(struct i40e_ring *tx_ring);
 void i40e_free_rx_resources(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c
index eabe1a3..515d856 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c
@@ -383,6 +383,78 @@ int i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget)
 	return failure ? budget : (int)total_rx_packets;
 }
 
+static void i40e_xmit_pkt(struct i40e_ring *xdp_ring, struct xdp_desc *desc,
+			  unsigned int *total_bytes)
+{
+	struct i40e_tx_desc *tx_desc;
+	dma_addr_t dma;
+
+	dma = xsk_buff_raw_get_dma(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, desc->addr);
+	xsk_buff_raw_dma_sync_for_device(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, dma, desc->len);
+
+	tx_desc = I40E_TX_DESC(xdp_ring, xdp_ring->next_to_use++);
+	tx_desc->buffer_addr = cpu_to_le64(dma);
+	tx_desc->cmd_type_offset_bsz = build_ctob(I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_ICRC | I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_EOP,
+						  0, desc->len, 0);
+
+	*total_bytes += desc->len;
+}
+
+/* This value should match the pragma below. Why 4? It is strictly
+ * empirical. It seems to be a good compromise between the advantage
+ * of having simultaneous outstanding reads to the DMA array that can
+ * hide each others latency and the disadvantage of having a larger
+ * code path.
+ */
+#define PKTS_PER_BATCH 4
+
+static void i40e_xmit_pkt_batch(struct i40e_ring *xdp_ring, struct xdp_desc *desc,
+				unsigned int *total_bytes)
+{
+	u16 ntu = xdp_ring->next_to_use;
+	struct i40e_tx_desc *tx_desc;
+	dma_addr_t dma;
+	u32 i;
+
+#pragma GCC unroll 4
+	for (i = 0; i < PKTS_PER_BATCH; i++) {
+		dma = xsk_buff_raw_get_dma(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, desc[i].addr);
+		xsk_buff_raw_dma_sync_for_device(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, dma, desc[i].len);
+
+		tx_desc = I40E_TX_DESC(xdp_ring, ntu++);
+		tx_desc->buffer_addr = cpu_to_le64(dma);
+		tx_desc->cmd_type_offset_bsz = build_ctob(I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_ICRC |
+							  I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_EOP,
+							  0, desc[i].len, 0);
+
+		*total_bytes += desc[i].len;
+	}
+
+	xdp_ring->next_to_use = ntu;
+}
+
+static void i40e_fill_tx_hw_ring(struct i40e_ring *xdp_ring, struct xdp_desc *descs, u32 nb_pkts,
+				 unsigned int *total_bytes)
+{
+	u32 batched, leftover, i;
+
+	batched = nb_pkts & ~(PKTS_PER_BATCH - 1);
+	leftover = nb_pkts & (PKTS_PER_BATCH - 1);
+	for (i = 0; i < batched; i += PKTS_PER_BATCH)
+		i40e_xmit_pkt_batch(xdp_ring, &descs[i], total_bytes);
+	for (i = batched; i < batched + leftover; i++)
+		i40e_xmit_pkt(xdp_ring, &descs[i], total_bytes);
+}
+
+static void i40e_set_rs_bit(struct i40e_ring *xdp_ring)
+{
+	u16 ntu = xdp_ring->next_to_use ? xdp_ring->next_to_use - 1 : xdp_ring->count - 1;
+	struct i40e_tx_desc *tx_desc;
+
+	tx_desc = I40E_TX_DESC(xdp_ring, ntu);
+	tx_desc->cmd_type_offset_bsz |= (I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_RS << I40E_TXD_QW1_CMD_SHIFT);
+}
+
 /**
  * i40e_xmit_zc - Performs zero-copy Tx AF_XDP
  * @xdp_ring: XDP Tx ring
@@ -392,45 +464,30 @@ int i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget)
  **/
 static bool i40e_xmit_zc(struct i40e_ring *xdp_ring, unsigned int budget)
 {
-	unsigned int sent_frames = 0, total_bytes = 0;
-	struct i40e_tx_desc *tx_desc = NULL;
-	struct xdp_desc desc;
-	dma_addr_t dma;
-
-	while (budget-- > 0) {
-		if (!xsk_tx_peek_desc(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, &desc))
-			break;
-
-		dma = xsk_buff_raw_get_dma(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, desc.addr);
-		xsk_buff_raw_dma_sync_for_device(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, dma,
-						 desc.len);
-
-		tx_desc = I40E_TX_DESC(xdp_ring, xdp_ring->next_to_use);
-		tx_desc->buffer_addr = cpu_to_le64(dma);
-		tx_desc->cmd_type_offset_bsz =
-			build_ctob(I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_ICRC
-				   | I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_EOP,
-				   0, desc.len, 0);
-
-		sent_frames++;
-		total_bytes += desc.len;
-
-		xdp_ring->next_to_use++;
-		if (xdp_ring->next_to_use == xdp_ring->count)
-			xdp_ring->next_to_use = 0;
+	struct xdp_desc *descs = xdp_ring->xsk_descs;
+	u32 nb_pkts, nb_processed = 0;
+	unsigned int total_bytes = 0;
+
+	nb_pkts = xsk_tx_peek_release_desc_batch(xdp_ring->xsk_pool, descs, budget);
+	if (!nb_pkts)
+		return false;
+
+	if (xdp_ring->next_to_use + nb_pkts >= xdp_ring->count) {
+		nb_processed = xdp_ring->count - xdp_ring->next_to_use;
+		i40e_fill_tx_hw_ring(xdp_ring, descs, nb_processed, &total_bytes);
+		xdp_ring->next_to_use = 0;
 	}
 
-	if (tx_desc) {
-		/* Request an interrupt for the last frame and bump tail ptr. */
-		tx_desc->cmd_type_offset_bsz |= (I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_RS <<
-						 I40E_TXD_QW1_CMD_SHIFT);
-		i40e_xdp_ring_update_tail(xdp_ring);
+	i40e_fill_tx_hw_ring(xdp_ring, &descs[nb_processed], nb_pkts - nb_processed,
+			     &total_bytes);
 
-		xsk_tx_release(xdp_ring->xsk_pool);
-		i40e_update_tx_stats(xdp_ring, sent_frames, total_bytes);
-	}
+	/* Request an interrupt for the last frame and bump tail ptr. */
+	i40e_set_rs_bit(xdp_ring);
+	i40e_xdp_ring_update_tail(xdp_ring);
+
+	i40e_update_tx_stats(xdp_ring, nb_pkts, total_bytes);
 
-	return !!budget;
+	return true;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.7.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-04 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-04 14:08 [PATCH bpf-next 0/6] xsk: i40e: Tx performance improvements Magnus Karlsson
2020-11-04 14:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/6] i40e: introduce lazy Tx completions for AF_XDP zero-copy Magnus Karlsson
2020-11-04 23:33   ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-04 23:35     ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-05 14:17     ` Magnus Karlsson
2020-11-05 15:45       ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-06 19:09         ` Magnus Karlsson
2020-11-04 14:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] samples/bpf: increment Tx stats at sending Magnus Karlsson
2020-11-09 20:47   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " John Fastabend
2020-11-10  7:12     ` Magnus Karlsson
2020-11-04 14:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/6] i40e: remove unnecessary sw_ring access from xsk Tx Magnus Karlsson
2020-11-09 20:48   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " John Fastabend
2020-11-04 14:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/6] xsk: introduce padding between more ring pointers Magnus Karlsson
2020-11-09 20:43   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " John Fastabend
2020-11-04 14:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/6] xsk: introduce batched Tx descriptor interfaces Magnus Karlsson
2020-11-09 21:06   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " John Fastabend
2020-11-10  8:28     ` Magnus Karlsson
2020-11-04 14:09 ` Magnus Karlsson [this message]
2020-11-04 23:01   ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/6] i40e: use batched xsk Tx interfaces to increase performance Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-11-05  7:19     ` Magnus Karlsson
2020-11-09 21:10   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " John Fastabend

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1604498942-24274-7-git-send-email-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
    --to=magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=maciejromanfijalkowski@gmail.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).