bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	maze@google.com, lmb@cloudflare.com, shaun@tigera.io,
	Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
	marek@cloudflare.com, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	eyal.birger@gmail.com, colrack@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next V16 2/7] bpf: fix bpf_fib_lookup helper MTU check for SKB ctx
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 14:38:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <161287789444.790810.15247494756551413508.stgit@firesoul> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <161287779408.790810.15631860742170694244.stgit@firesoul>

BPF end-user on Cilium slack-channel (Carlo Carraro) wants to use
bpf_fib_lookup for doing MTU-check, but *prior* to extending packet size,
by adjusting fib_params 'tot_len' with the packet length plus the expected
encap size. (Just like the bpf_check_mtu helper supports). He discovered
that for SKB ctx the param->tot_len was not used, instead skb->len was used
(via MTU check in is_skb_forwardable() that checks against netdev MTU).

Fix this by using fib_params 'tot_len' for MTU check. If not provided (e.g.
zero) then keep existing TC behaviour intact. Notice that 'tot_len' for MTU
check is done like XDP code-path, which checks against FIB-dst MTU.

V16:
- Revert V13 optimization, 2nd lookup is against egress/resulting netdev

V13:
- Only do ifindex lookup one time, calling dev_get_by_index_rcu().

V10:
- Use same method as XDP for 'tot_len' MTU check

Fixes: 4c79579b44b1 ("bpf: Change bpf_fib_lookup to return lookup status")
Reported-by: Carlo Carraro <colrack@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
---
 net/core/filter.c |   13 ++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 731571762f8d..46b06a693e39 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -5569,6 +5569,7 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_skb_fib_lookup, struct sk_buff *, skb,
 {
 	struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
 	int rc = -EAFNOSUPPORT;
+	bool check_mtu = false;
 
 	if (plen < sizeof(*params))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -5576,22 +5577,28 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_skb_fib_lookup, struct sk_buff *, skb,
 	if (flags & ~(BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_DIRECT | BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_OUTPUT))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	if (params->tot_len)
+		check_mtu = true;
+
 	switch (params->family) {
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET)
 	case AF_INET:
-		rc = bpf_ipv4_fib_lookup(net, params, flags, false);
+		rc = bpf_ipv4_fib_lookup(net, params, flags, check_mtu);
 		break;
 #endif
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
 	case AF_INET6:
-		rc = bpf_ipv6_fib_lookup(net, params, flags, false);
+		rc = bpf_ipv6_fib_lookup(net, params, flags, check_mtu);
 		break;
 #endif
 	}
 
-	if (!rc) {
+	if (rc == BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_SUCCESS && !check_mtu) {
 		struct net_device *dev;
 
+		/* When tot_len isn't provided by user, check skb
+		 * against MTU of FIB lookup resulting net_device
+		 */
 		dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, params->ifindex);
 		if (!is_skb_forwardable(dev, skb))
 			rc = BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_FRAG_NEEDED;



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-09 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-09 13:38 [PATCH bpf-next V16 0/7] bpf: New approach for BPF MTU handling Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-02-09 13:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next V16 1/7] bpf: Remove MTU check in __bpf_skb_max_len Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-02-09 13:38 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2021-02-09 13:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next V16 3/7] bpf: bpf_fib_lookup return MTU value as output when looked up Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-02-09 13:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next V16 4/7] bpf: add BPF-helper for MTU checking Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-02-09 13:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next V16 5/7] bpf: drop MTU check when doing TC-BPF redirect to ingress Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-02-09 13:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next V16 6/7] selftests/bpf: use bpf_check_mtu in selftest test_cls_redirect Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-02-09 13:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next V16 7/7] selftests/bpf: tests using bpf_check_mtu BPF-helper Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-02-13  0:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next V16 0/7] bpf: New approach for BPF MTU handling patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=161287789444.790810.15247494756551413508.stgit@firesoul \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=borkmann@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=colrack@gmail.com \
    --cc=eyal.birger@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lmb@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=marek@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=maze@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaun@tigera.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).