From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DB5C433E6 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:40:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E2964ED3 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:40:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231157AbhBINk1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2021 08:40:27 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:30084 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231571AbhBINjw (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2021 08:39:52 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1612877905; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=JNj78PKlgNgIkf/qXNAPWFWB1p9VC1gvY8cZgFom3TY=; b=D3JHBQyHDu2scpp4WK5LWxBSAIXeNyCGanMF7Y2ZYTNotmaYzxYSmQF0JY4DvJ0ECSo/B2 mEJXT2Qf7/5BxGxx+wVKg6uM4rT88JUW7jzb3Z1bx+6mQElRMj8GiPQOzkN7rh9VrHbh1h Vq+euo71OxpqcIMSstufejgjMf+wBJw= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-394-YEOlEHHtN_i26mXnUvnrIw-1; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 08:38:21 -0500 X-MC-Unique: YEOlEHHtN_i26mXnUvnrIw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 475A96D50E; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from firesoul.localdomain (unknown [10.40.208.19]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A83B62464; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.42.3] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by firesoul.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E09630736C73; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 14:38:14 +0100 (CET) Subject: [PATCH bpf-next V16 2/7] bpf: fix bpf_fib_lookup helper MTU check for SKB ctx From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer To: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , maze@google.com, lmb@cloudflare.com, shaun@tigera.io, Lorenzo Bianconi , marek@cloudflare.com, John Fastabend , Jakub Kicinski , eyal.birger@gmail.com, colrack@gmail.com Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 14:38:14 +0100 Message-ID: <161287789444.790810.15247494756551413508.stgit@firesoul> In-Reply-To: <161287779408.790810.15631860742170694244.stgit@firesoul> References: <161287779408.790810.15631860742170694244.stgit@firesoul> User-Agent: StGit/0.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org BPF end-user on Cilium slack-channel (Carlo Carraro) wants to use bpf_fib_lookup for doing MTU-check, but *prior* to extending packet size, by adjusting fib_params 'tot_len' with the packet length plus the expected encap size. (Just like the bpf_check_mtu helper supports). He discovered that for SKB ctx the param->tot_len was not used, instead skb->len was used (via MTU check in is_skb_forwardable() that checks against netdev MTU). Fix this by using fib_params 'tot_len' for MTU check. If not provided (e.g. zero) then keep existing TC behaviour intact. Notice that 'tot_len' for MTU check is done like XDP code-path, which checks against FIB-dst MTU. V16: - Revert V13 optimization, 2nd lookup is against egress/resulting netdev V13: - Only do ifindex lookup one time, calling dev_get_by_index_rcu(). V10: - Use same method as XDP for 'tot_len' MTU check Fixes: 4c79579b44b1 ("bpf: Change bpf_fib_lookup to return lookup status") Reported-by: Carlo Carraro Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer --- net/core/filter.c | 13 ++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c index 731571762f8d..46b06a693e39 100644 --- a/net/core/filter.c +++ b/net/core/filter.c @@ -5569,6 +5569,7 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_skb_fib_lookup, struct sk_buff *, skb, { struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev); int rc = -EAFNOSUPPORT; + bool check_mtu = false; if (plen < sizeof(*params)) return -EINVAL; @@ -5576,22 +5577,28 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_skb_fib_lookup, struct sk_buff *, skb, if (flags & ~(BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_DIRECT | BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_OUTPUT)) return -EINVAL; + if (params->tot_len) + check_mtu = true; + switch (params->family) { #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) case AF_INET: - rc = bpf_ipv4_fib_lookup(net, params, flags, false); + rc = bpf_ipv4_fib_lookup(net, params, flags, check_mtu); break; #endif #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) case AF_INET6: - rc = bpf_ipv6_fib_lookup(net, params, flags, false); + rc = bpf_ipv6_fib_lookup(net, params, flags, check_mtu); break; #endif } - if (!rc) { + if (rc == BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_SUCCESS && !check_mtu) { struct net_device *dev; + /* When tot_len isn't provided by user, check skb + * against MTU of FIB lookup resulting net_device + */ dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, params->ifindex); if (!is_skb_forwardable(dev, skb)) rc = BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_FRAG_NEEDED;