From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org, kpsingh@chromium.org, revest@google.com,
jackmanb@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kpsingh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/5] bpf: Be less specific about socket cookies guarantees
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 02:20:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <161309640759.12988.9852007346010349044.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210210111406.785541-1-revest@chromium.org>
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master):
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:14:02 +0100 you wrote:
> Since "92acdc58ab11 bpf, net: Rework cookie generator as per-cpu one"
> socket cookies are not guaranteed to be non-decreasing. The
> bpf_get_socket_cookie helper descriptions are currently specifying that
> cookies are non-decreasing but we don't want users to rely on that.
>
> Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
> Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v7,1/5] bpf: Be less specific about socket cookies guarantees
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/07881ccbf40c
- [bpf-next,v7,2/5] bpf: Expose bpf_get_socket_cookie to tracing programs
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c5dbb89fc2ac
- [bpf-next,v7,3/5] selftests/bpf: Integrate the socket_cookie test to test_progs
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/61f8c9c8f3c8
- [bpf-next,v7,4/5] selftests/bpf: Use vmlinux.h in socket_cookie_prog.c
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/6cd4dcc3fb81
- [bpf-next,v7,5/5] selftests/bpf: Add a selftest for the tracing bpf_get_socket_cookie
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/6fdd671baaf5
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-12 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-10 11:14 [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/5] bpf: Be less specific about socket cookies guarantees Florent Revest
2021-02-10 11:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/5] bpf: Expose bpf_get_socket_cookie to tracing programs Florent Revest
2021-02-10 19:51 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-10 19:55 ` Florent Revest
2021-02-12 2:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-02-10 11:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 3/5] selftests/bpf: Integrate the socket_cookie test to test_progs Florent Revest
2021-02-10 11:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 4/5] selftests/bpf: Use vmlinux.h in socket_cookie_prog.c Florent Revest
2021-02-10 11:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add a selftest for the tracing bpf_get_socket_cookie Florent Revest
2021-02-12 2:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=161309640759.12988.9852007346010349044.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jackmanb@chromium.org \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=revest@chromium.org \
--cc=revest@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).