From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43785C4708F for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 03:28:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A6C6128A for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 03:28:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231259AbhFBDaB (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2021 23:30:01 -0400 Received: from mail.loongson.cn ([114.242.206.163]:45838 "EHLO loongson.cn" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231217AbhFBDaB (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2021 23:30:01 -0400 Received: from linux.localdomain (unknown [113.200.148.30]) by mail.loongson.cn (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf9DxH0O6+rZgh7MIAA--.9496S7; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 11:28:13 +0800 (CST) From: Tiezhu Yang To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sasha Levin Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Alexei Starovoitov Subject: [PATCH 4.19 5/9] bpf: Adjust F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS handling in test_verifier.c Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 11:27:49 +0800 Message-Id: <1622604473-781-6-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.0 In-Reply-To: <1622604473-781-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> References: <1622604473-781-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf9DxH0O6+rZgh7MIAA--.9496S7 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxXFyDGrykWFyfCFWUtFyfXrb_yoWrCrWrpF 1ftF90kF48tF13K3y2y34kuFW0v3WvqryfCF10y347XF1kA34xKrW8WFyrXF95CrZ5X3WF 9w17t3Z0kw13XaDanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUBab7Iv0xC_Kw4lb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26rWj6s0DM7CY07I2 0VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI 8067AKxVWUAVCq3wA2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_Xr0E3s1l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28C jxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW5JVW7JwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI 8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_Cr1j6rxdM28EF7xvwVC2 z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oVCq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0V AKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l Ox8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JMxkIecxEwVAFwVW8GwCF04k20x vY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I 3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_JF0_Jw1lIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIx AIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUCVW8JwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1lIxAI cVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6r1I6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2js IEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Gr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07brtxDUUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: p1dqw3xlh2x3gn0dqz5rrqw2lrqou0/ Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org From: "David S. Miller" commit c7665702d3208b77b8e00f0699b6b88241b04360 upstream Make it set the flag argument to bpf_verify_program() which will relax the alignment restrictions. Now all such test cases will go properly through the verifier even on inefficient unaligned access architectures. On inefficient unaligned access architectures do not try to run such programs, instead mark the test case as passing but annotate the result similarly to how it is done now in the presence of this flag. So, we get complete full coverage for all REJECT test cases, and at least verifier level coverage for ACCEPT test cases. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 919f97a..686f5d1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -12844,13 +12844,14 @@ static int set_admin(bool admin) static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, int *passes, int *errors) { - int fd_prog, expected_ret, reject_from_alignment; + int fd_prog, expected_ret, alignment_prevented_execution; int prog_len, prog_type = test->prog_type; struct bpf_insn *prog = test->insns; int map_fds[MAX_NR_MAPS]; const char *expected_err; uint32_t expected_val; uint32_t retval; + __u32 pflags; int i, err; for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_MAPS; i++) @@ -12861,9 +12862,12 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, do_test_fixup(test, prog_type, prog, map_fds); prog_len = probe_filter_length(prog); - fd_prog = bpf_verify_program(prog_type, prog, prog_len, - test->flags & F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT ? - BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT : 0, + pflags = 0; + if (test->flags & F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT) + pflags |= BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT; + if (test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) + pflags |= BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT; + fd_prog = bpf_verify_program(prog_type, prog, prog_len, pflags, "GPL", 0, bpf_vlog, sizeof(bpf_vlog), 1); expected_ret = unpriv && test->result_unpriv != UNDEF ? @@ -12873,28 +12877,27 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, expected_val = unpriv && test->retval_unpriv ? test->retval_unpriv : test->retval; - reject_from_alignment = fd_prog < 0 && - (test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && - strstr(bpf_vlog, "misaligned"); -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS - if (reject_from_alignment) { - printf("FAIL\nFailed due to alignment despite having efficient unaligned access: '%s'!\n", - strerror(errno)); - goto fail_log; - } -#endif + alignment_prevented_execution = 0; + if (expected_ret == ACCEPT) { - if (fd_prog < 0 && !reject_from_alignment) { + if (fd_prog < 0) { printf("FAIL\nFailed to load prog '%s'!\n", strerror(errno)); goto fail_log; } +#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS + if (fd_prog >= 0 && + (test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) { + alignment_prevented_execution = 1; + goto test_ok; + } +#endif } else { if (fd_prog >= 0) { printf("FAIL\nUnexpected success to load!\n"); goto fail_log; } - if (!strstr(bpf_vlog, expected_err) && !reject_from_alignment) { + if (!strstr(bpf_vlog, expected_err)) { printf("FAIL\nUnexpected error message!\n\tEXP: %s\n\tRES: %s\n", expected_err, bpf_vlog); goto fail_log; @@ -12922,9 +12925,12 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, goto fail_log; } } +#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS +test_ok: +#endif (*passes)++; - printf("OK%s\n", reject_from_alignment ? - " (NOTE: reject due to unknown alignment)" : ""); + printf("OK%s\n", alignment_prevented_execution ? + " (NOTE: not executed due to unknown alignment)" : ""); close_fds: close(fd_prog); for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_MAPS; i++) -- 2.1.0