* [PATCHv2 bpf-next] bpf, x86: Remove unused cnt increase from EMIT macro
@ 2021-06-23 11:25 Jiri Olsa
2021-06-24 11:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2021-06-23 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: netdev, bpf, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song,
John Fastabend, KP Singh
Removing unused cnt increase from EMIT macro together
with cnt declarations. This was introduced in commit [1]
to ensure proper code generation. But that code was
removed in commit [2] and this extra code was left in.
[1] b52f00e6a715 ("x86: bpf_jit: implement bpf_tail_call() helper")
[2] ebf7d1f508a7 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall handling in JIT")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
---
v2 changes:
- removed cnt also in emit_prologue [David]
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 44 ++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 2a2e290fa5d8..db1e83813db5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static u8 *emit_code(u8 *ptr, u32 bytes, unsigned int len)
}
#define EMIT(bytes, len) \
- do { prog = emit_code(prog, bytes, len); cnt += len; } while (0)
+ do { prog = emit_code(prog, bytes, len); } while (0)
#define EMIT1(b1) EMIT(b1, 1)
#define EMIT2(b1, b2) EMIT((b1) + ((b2) << 8), 2)
@@ -239,7 +239,6 @@ struct jit_context {
static void push_callee_regs(u8 **pprog, bool *callee_regs_used)
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
- int cnt = 0;
if (callee_regs_used[0])
EMIT1(0x53); /* push rbx */
@@ -255,7 +254,6 @@ static void push_callee_regs(u8 **pprog, bool *callee_regs_used)
static void pop_callee_regs(u8 **pprog, bool *callee_regs_used)
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
- int cnt = 0;
if (callee_regs_used[3])
EMIT2(0x41, 0x5F); /* pop r15 */
@@ -277,13 +275,12 @@ static void emit_prologue(u8 **pprog, u32 stack_depth, bool ebpf_from_cbpf,
bool tail_call_reachable, bool is_subprog)
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
- int cnt = X86_PATCH_SIZE;
/* BPF trampoline can be made to work without these nops,
* but let's waste 5 bytes for now and optimize later
*/
- memcpy(prog, x86_nops[5], cnt);
- prog += cnt;
+ memcpy(prog, x86_nops[5], X86_PATCH_SIZE);
+ prog += X86_PATCH_SIZE;
if (!ebpf_from_cbpf) {
if (tail_call_reachable && !is_subprog)
EMIT2(0x31, 0xC0); /* xor eax, eax */
@@ -303,7 +300,6 @@ static void emit_prologue(u8 **pprog, u32 stack_depth, bool ebpf_from_cbpf,
static int emit_patch(u8 **pprog, void *func, void *ip, u8 opcode)
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
- int cnt = 0;
s64 offset;
offset = func - (ip + X86_PATCH_SIZE);
@@ -423,7 +419,6 @@ static void emit_bpf_tail_call_indirect(u8 **pprog, bool *callee_regs_used,
int off1 = 42;
int off2 = 31;
int off3 = 9;
- int cnt = 0;
/* count the additional bytes used for popping callee regs from stack
* that need to be taken into account for each of the offsets that
@@ -513,7 +508,6 @@ static void emit_bpf_tail_call_direct(struct bpf_jit_poke_descriptor *poke,
int pop_bytes = 0;
int off1 = 20;
int poke_off;
- int cnt = 0;
/* count the additional bytes used for popping callee regs to stack
* that need to be taken into account for jump offset that is used for
@@ -615,7 +609,6 @@ static void emit_mov_imm32(u8 **pprog, bool sign_propagate,
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
u8 b1, b2, b3;
- int cnt = 0;
/*
* Optimization: if imm32 is positive, use 'mov %eax, imm32'
@@ -655,7 +648,6 @@ static void emit_mov_imm64(u8 **pprog, u32 dst_reg,
const u32 imm32_hi, const u32 imm32_lo)
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
- int cnt = 0;
if (is_uimm32(((u64)imm32_hi << 32) | (u32)imm32_lo)) {
/*
@@ -678,7 +670,6 @@ static void emit_mov_imm64(u8 **pprog, u32 dst_reg,
static void emit_mov_reg(u8 **pprog, bool is64, u32 dst_reg, u32 src_reg)
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
- int cnt = 0;
if (is64) {
/* mov dst, src */
@@ -697,7 +688,6 @@ static void emit_mov_reg(u8 **pprog, bool is64, u32 dst_reg, u32 src_reg)
static void emit_insn_suffix(u8 **pprog, u32 ptr_reg, u32 val_reg, int off)
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
- int cnt = 0;
if (is_imm8(off)) {
/* 1-byte signed displacement.
@@ -720,7 +710,6 @@ static void emit_insn_suffix(u8 **pprog, u32 ptr_reg, u32 val_reg, int off)
static void maybe_emit_mod(u8 **pprog, u32 dst_reg, u32 src_reg, bool is64)
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
- int cnt = 0;
if (is64)
EMIT1(add_2mod(0x48, dst_reg, src_reg));
@@ -733,7 +722,6 @@ static void maybe_emit_mod(u8 **pprog, u32 dst_reg, u32 src_reg, bool is64)
static void emit_ldx(u8 **pprog, u32 size, u32 dst_reg, u32 src_reg, int off)
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
- int cnt = 0;
switch (size) {
case BPF_B:
@@ -764,7 +752,6 @@ static void emit_ldx(u8 **pprog, u32 size, u32 dst_reg, u32 src_reg, int off)
static void emit_stx(u8 **pprog, u32 size, u32 dst_reg, u32 src_reg, int off)
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
- int cnt = 0;
switch (size) {
case BPF_B:
@@ -799,7 +786,6 @@ static int emit_atomic(u8 **pprog, u8 atomic_op,
u32 dst_reg, u32 src_reg, s16 off, u8 bpf_size)
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
- int cnt = 0;
EMIT1(0xF0); /* lock prefix */
@@ -869,10 +855,10 @@ static void detect_reg_usage(struct bpf_insn *insn, int insn_cnt,
}
}
-static int emit_nops(u8 **pprog, int len)
+static void emit_nops(u8 **pprog, int len)
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
- int i, noplen, cnt = 0;
+ int i, noplen;
while (len > 0) {
noplen = len;
@@ -886,8 +872,6 @@ static int emit_nops(u8 **pprog, int len)
}
*pprog = prog;
-
- return cnt;
}
#define INSN_SZ_DIFF (((addrs[i] - addrs[i - 1]) - (prog - temp)))
@@ -902,7 +886,7 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image,
bool tail_call_seen = false;
bool seen_exit = false;
u8 temp[BPF_MAX_INSN_SIZE + BPF_INSN_SAFETY];
- int i, cnt = 0, excnt = 0;
+ int i, excnt = 0;
int ilen, proglen = 0;
u8 *prog = temp;
int err;
@@ -1576,7 +1560,7 @@ st: if (is_imm8(insn->off))
nops);
return -EFAULT;
}
- cnt += emit_nops(&prog, nops);
+ emit_nops(&prog, nops);
}
EMIT2(jmp_cond, jmp_offset);
} else if (is_simm32(jmp_offset)) {
@@ -1622,7 +1606,7 @@ st: if (is_imm8(insn->off))
nops);
return -EFAULT;
}
- cnt += emit_nops(&prog, nops);
+ emit_nops(&prog, nops);
}
break;
}
@@ -1647,7 +1631,7 @@ st: if (is_imm8(insn->off))
nops);
return -EFAULT;
}
- cnt += emit_nops(&prog, INSN_SZ_DIFF - 2);
+ emit_nops(&prog, INSN_SZ_DIFF - 2);
}
EMIT2(0xEB, jmp_offset);
} else if (is_simm32(jmp_offset)) {
@@ -1754,7 +1738,6 @@ static int invoke_bpf_prog(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog,
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
u8 *jmp_insn;
- int cnt = 0;
/* arg1: mov rdi, progs[i] */
emit_mov_imm64(&prog, BPF_REG_1, (long) p >> 32, (u32) (long) p);
@@ -1822,7 +1805,6 @@ static void emit_align(u8 **pprog, u32 align)
static int emit_cond_near_jump(u8 **pprog, void *func, void *ip, u8 jmp_cond)
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
- int cnt = 0;
s64 offset;
offset = func - (ip + 2 + 4);
@@ -1854,7 +1836,7 @@ static int invoke_bpf_mod_ret(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog,
u8 **branches)
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
- int i, cnt = 0;
+ int i;
/* The first fmod_ret program will receive a garbage return value.
* Set this to 0 to avoid confusing the program.
@@ -1950,7 +1932,7 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
struct bpf_tramp_progs *tprogs,
void *orig_call)
{
- int ret, i, cnt = 0, nr_args = m->nr_args;
+ int ret, i, nr_args = m->nr_args;
int stack_size = nr_args * 8;
struct bpf_tramp_progs *fentry = &tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY];
struct bpf_tramp_progs *fexit = &tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT];
@@ -2095,8 +2077,6 @@ static int emit_fallback_jump(u8 **pprog)
*/
err = emit_jump(&prog, __x86_indirect_thunk_rdx, prog);
#else
- int cnt = 0;
-
EMIT2(0xFF, 0xE2); /* jmp rdx */
#endif
*pprog = prog;
@@ -2106,7 +2086,7 @@ static int emit_fallback_jump(u8 **pprog)
static int emit_bpf_dispatcher(u8 **pprog, int a, int b, s64 *progs)
{
u8 *jg_reloc, *prog = *pprog;
- int pivot, err, jg_bytes = 1, cnt = 0;
+ int pivot, err, jg_bytes = 1;
s64 jg_offset;
if (a == b) {
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2 bpf-next] bpf, x86: Remove unused cnt increase from EMIT macro
2021-06-23 11:25 [PATCHv2 bpf-next] bpf, x86: Remove unused cnt increase from EMIT macro Jiri Olsa
@ 2021-06-24 11:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2021-06-24 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Olsa
Cc: ast, daniel, andriin, netdev, bpf, kafai, songliubraving, yhs,
john.fastabend, kpsingh
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master):
On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 13:25:04 +0200 you wrote:
> Removing unused cnt increase from EMIT macro together
> with cnt declarations. This was introduced in commit [1]
> to ensure proper code generation. But that code was
> removed in commit [2] and this extra code was left in.
>
> [1] b52f00e6a715 ("x86: bpf_jit: implement bpf_tail_call() helper")
> [2] ebf7d1f508a7 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall handling in JIT")
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [PATCHv2,bpf-next] bpf, x86: Remove unused cnt increase from EMIT macro
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/ced50fc49f3b
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-24 11:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-23 11:25 [PATCHv2 bpf-next] bpf, x86: Remove unused cnt increase from EMIT macro Jiri Olsa
2021-06-24 11:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).