bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@collabora.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Add arm target register definitions
Date: Mon,  4 Mar 2019 22:50:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190304205019.15071-1-adrian.ratiu@collabora.com> (raw)

eBPF "restricted C" code can be compiled with LLVM/clang using target
triplets like armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf and loaded/run with small
cross-compiled gobpf/elf [1] programs without requiring a full BCC
port which is also undesirable on small embedded systems due to its
size footprint. The only missing pieces are these helper macros which
otherwise have to be redefined by each eBPF arm program.

[1] https://github.com/iovisor/gobpf/tree/master/elf

Signed-off-by: Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@collabora.com>
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
index 6c77cf7bedce..f7883576f445 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
@@ -232,6 +232,9 @@ static int (*bpf_skb_pull_data)(void *, int len) =
 #elif defined(__TARGET_ARCH_s930x)
 	#define bpf_target_s930x
 	#define bpf_target_defined
+#elif defined(__TARGET_ARCH_arm)
+	#define bpf_target_arm
+	#define bpf_target_defined
 #elif defined(__TARGET_ARCH_arm64)
 	#define bpf_target_arm64
 	#define bpf_target_defined
@@ -254,6 +257,8 @@ static int (*bpf_skb_pull_data)(void *, int len) =
 	#define bpf_target_x86
 #elif defined(__s390x__)
 	#define bpf_target_s930x
+#elif defined(__arm__)
+	#define bpf_target_arm
 #elif defined(__aarch64__)
 	#define bpf_target_arm64
 #elif defined(__mips__)
@@ -291,6 +296,19 @@ static int (*bpf_skb_pull_data)(void *, int len) =
 #define PT_REGS_SP(x) ((x)->gprs[15])
 #define PT_REGS_IP(x) ((x)->psw.addr)
+#elif defined(bpf_target_arm)
+#define PT_REGS_PARM1(x) ((x)->uregs[0])
+#define PT_REGS_PARM2(x) ((x)->uregs[1])
+#define PT_REGS_PARM3(x) ((x)->uregs[2])
+#define PT_REGS_PARM4(x) ((x)->uregs[3])
+#define PT_REGS_PARM5(x) ((x)->uregs[4])
+#define PT_REGS_RET(x) ((x)->uregs[14])
+#define PT_REGS_FP(x) ((x)->uregs[11]) /* Works only with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER */
+#define PT_REGS_RC(x) ((x)->uregs[0])
+#define PT_REGS_SP(x) ((x)->uregs[13])
+#define PT_REGS_IP(x) ((x)->uregs[12])
 #elif defined(bpf_target_arm64)
 #define PT_REGS_PARM1(x) ((x)->regs[0])

             reply	other threads:[~2019-03-04 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-04 20:50 Adrian Ratiu [this message]
2019-03-04 22:59 ` Song Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190304205019.15071-1-adrian.ratiu@collabora.com \
    --to=adrian.ratiu@collabora.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Add arm target register definitions' \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
on how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox