BPF Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Kairui Song <kasong@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] objtool: Fix ORC unwinding in non-JIT BPF generated code
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 16:19:29 -0500
Message-ID: <20190614211929.drnnawbi7guqj2ck@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQLK3ixK1JWF_mfScZoFzFF=6O8f1WcqkYqiejKeex1GSQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 02:09:25PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 2:07 PM Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 01:58:42PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 12:56:41PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > Objtool currently ignores ___bpf_prog_run() because it doesn't
> > > > understand the jump table.  This results in the ORC unwinder not being
> > > > able to unwind through non-JIT BPF code.
> > > >
> > > > Luckily, the BPF jump table resembles a GCC switch jump table, which
> > > > objtool already knows how to read.
> > > >
> > > > Add generic support for reading any static local jump table array named
> > > > "jump_table", and rename the BPF variable accordingly, so objtool can
> > > > generate ORC data for ___bpf_prog_run().
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: d15d356887e7 ("perf/x86: Make perf callchains work without CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER")
> > > > Reported-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >  kernel/bpf/core.c     |  5 ++---
> > > >  tools/objtool/check.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> > > >  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> > > > index 7c473f208a10..aa546ef7dbdc 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> > > > @@ -1299,7 +1299,7 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, u64 *stack)
> > > >  {
> > > >  #define BPF_INSN_2_LBL(x, y)    [BPF_##x | BPF_##y] = &&x##_##y
> > > >  #define BPF_INSN_3_LBL(x, y, z) [BPF_##x | BPF_##y | BPF_##z] = &&x##_##y##_##z
> > > > -   static const void *jumptable[256] = {
> > > > +   static const void *jump_table[256] = {
> > > >             [0 ... 255] = &&default_label,
> > > >             /* Now overwrite non-defaults ... */
> > > >             BPF_INSN_MAP(BPF_INSN_2_LBL, BPF_INSN_3_LBL),
> > > > @@ -1315,7 +1315,7 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, u64 *stack)
> > > >  #define CONT_JMP ({ insn++; goto select_insn; })
> > > >
> > > >  select_insn:
> > > > -   goto *jumptable[insn->code];
> > > > +   goto *jump_table[insn->code];
> > > >
> > > >     /* ALU */
> > > >  #define ALU(OPCODE, OP)                    \
> > > > @@ -1558,7 +1558,6 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, u64 *stack)
> > > >             BUG_ON(1);
> > > >             return 0;
> > > >  }
> > > > -STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD(___bpf_prog_run); /* jump table */
> > > >
> > > >  #define PROG_NAME(stack_size) __bpf_prog_run##stack_size
> > > >  #define DEFINE_BPF_PROG_RUN(stack_size) \
> > > > diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
> > > > index 172f99195726..8341c2fff14f 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/objtool/check.c
> > > > +++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
> > > > @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
> > > >
> > > >  #define FAKE_JUMP_OFFSET -1
> > > >
> > > > +#define JUMP_TABLE_SYM_PREFIX "jump_table."
> > >
> > > since external tool will be looking at it should it be named
> > > "bpf_jump_table." to avoid potential name conflicts?
> > > Or even more unique name?
> > > Like "bpf_interpreter_jump_table." ?
> >
> > No, the point is that it's a generic feature which can also be used any
> > non-BPF code which might also have a jump table.
> 
> and you're proposing to name all such jump tables in the kernel
> as static foo jump_table[] ?

That's the idea.

-- 
Josh

  reply index

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-14 17:56 [PATCH v2 0/5] x86/bpf: unwinder fixes Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] perf/x86: Always store regs->ip in perf_callchain_kernel() Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 20:56   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 21:06     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 21:16       ` Steven Rostedt
2019-06-14 21:20         ` Song Liu
2019-06-14 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] objtool: Fix ORC unwinding in non-JIT BPF generated code Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 20:58   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 21:07     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 21:09       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 21:19         ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2019-06-14 21:22           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 23:17             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 23:30               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-15  0:02                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-15  0:06                   ` abhja kaanlani
2019-06-15  0:07                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-17 14:57     ` David Laight
2019-06-14 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] x86/bpf: Move epilogue generation to a dedicated function Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] x86/bpf: Fix 64-bit JIT frame pointer usage Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 21:05   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 21:19     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 21:27       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 23:13         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 23:23           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 23:54             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-15  0:02               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-15  4:27                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-15  5:16                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-15 12:57                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] x86/unwind/orc: Fall back to using frame pointers for generated code Josh Poimboeuf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190614211929.drnnawbi7guqj2ck@treble \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kasong@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

BPF Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/0 bpf/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 bpf bpf/ https://lore.kernel.org/bpf \
		bpf@vger.kernel.org bpf@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index bpf


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.bpf


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox