bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf trace: Handle NULL pointer dereference in trace__syscall_info()
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:39:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190618063937.GB24549@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190617173203.GA23094@kernel.org>

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 02:32:03PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 05:11:40PM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> > trace__init_bpf_map_syscall_args() invokes trace__syscall_info() to
> > retrieve system calls information, it always passes NULL for 'evsel'
> > argument; when id is an invalid value then the logging will try to
> > output event name, this triggers NULL pointer dereference.
> > 
> > This patch directly uses string "unknown" for event name when 'evsel'
> > is NULL pointer.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > index 5cd74651db4c..49dfb2fd393b 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > @@ -1764,7 +1764,7 @@ static struct syscall *trace__syscall_info(struct trace *trace,
> >  		static u64 n;
> >  
> >  		pr_debug("Invalid syscall %d id, skipping (%s, %" PRIu64 ")\n",
> > -			 id, perf_evsel__name(evsel), ++n);
> > +			 id, evsel ? perf_evsel__name(evsel) : "unknown", ++n);
> >  		return NULL;
> 
> What do you think of this instead?

Yes, I agree the below change is right thing to do.  FWIW:

Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>

BTW, my patch followed the code in [1], after apply below your change,
could consider to simplify code in [1] for without checking 'evsel' is
NULL pointer anymore.

Thanks,
Leo

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/tree/tools/perf/builtin-report.c?h=perf/core#n301

> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index 68beef8f47ff..1d6af95b9207 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -590,6 +590,9 @@ const char *perf_evsel__name(struct perf_evsel *evsel)
>  {
>  	char bf[128];
>  
> +	if (!evsel)
> +		goto out_unknown;
> +
>  	if (evsel->name)
>  		return evsel->name;
>  
> @@ -629,7 +632,10 @@ const char *perf_evsel__name(struct perf_evsel *evsel)
>  
>  	evsel->name = strdup(bf);
>  
> -	return evsel->name ?: "unknown";
> +	if (evsel->name)
> +		return evsel->name;
> +out_unknown:
> +	return "unknown";
>  }
>  
>  const char *perf_evsel__group_name(struct perf_evsel *evsel)

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-18  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-17  9:11 [PATCH 1/2] perf trace: Use pr_debug() instead of fprintf() for logging Leo Yan
2019-06-17  9:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf trace: Handle NULL pointer dereference in trace__syscall_info() Leo Yan
2019-06-17 17:32   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-06-18  6:39     ` Leo Yan [this message]
2019-06-17 15:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf trace: Use pr_debug() instead of fprintf() for logging Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-06-18  6:24   ` Leo Yan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190618063937.GB24549@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s \
    --to=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).