From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, yhs@fb.com,
davem@davemloft.net, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com,
hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com,
Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 09/15] samples/bpf: use own flags but not HOSTCFLAGS
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 23:41:28 +0300
Message-ID: <20191009204134.26960-10-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191009204134.26960-1-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
While compiling natively, the host's cflags and ldflags are equal to
ones used from HOSTCFLAGS and HOSTLDFLAGS. When cross compiling it
should have own, used for target arch. While verification, for arm,
arm64 and x86_64 the following flags were used always:
-Wall -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer
-Wmissing-prototypes
-Wstrict-prototypes
So, add them as they were verified and used before adding
Makefile.target and lets omit "-fomit-frame-pointer" as were
proposed while review, as no sense in such optimization for samples.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
---
samples/bpf/Makefile | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
index 91bfb421c278..57a15ff938a6 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
@@ -176,8 +176,10 @@ BPF_EXTRA_CFLAGS := $(ARM_ARCH_SELECTOR)
TPROGS_CFLAGS += $(ARM_ARCH_SELECTOR)
endif
-TPROGS_LDLIBS := $(KBUILD_HOSTLDLIBS)
-TPROGS_CFLAGS += $(KBUILD_HOSTCFLAGS) $(HOST_EXTRACFLAGS)
+TPROGS_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2
+TPROGS_CFLAGS += -Wmissing-prototypes
+TPROGS_CFLAGS += -Wstrict-prototypes
+
TPROGS_CFLAGS += -I$(objtree)/usr/include
TPROGS_CFLAGS += -I$(srctree)/tools/lib/bpf/
TPROGS_CFLAGS += -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply index
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-09 20:41 [PATCH v4 bpf-next 00/15] samples: bpf: improve/fix cross-compilation Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-09 20:41 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 01/15] samples/bpf: fix HDR_PROBE "echo" Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-09 22:42 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-09 20:41 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 02/15] samples/bpf: fix cookie_uid_helper_example obj build Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-09 20:41 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 03/15] samples/bpf: use --target from cross-compile Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-09 20:41 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 04/15] samples/bpf: use own EXTRA_CFLAGS for clang commands Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-09 20:41 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 05/15] samples/bpf: use __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ selector for arm Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-09 20:41 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 06/15] samples/bpf: drop unnecessarily inclusion for bpf_load Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-09 20:41 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 07/15] samples/bpf: add makefile.target for separate CC target build Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-09 20:41 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 08/15] samples/bpf: base target programs rules on Makefile.target Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-09 20:41 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk [this message]
2019-10-09 20:41 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 10/15] samples/bpf: use target CC environment for HDR_PROBE Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-09 20:41 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 11/15] libbpf: don't use cxx to test_libpf target Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-10 0:26 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-09 20:41 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 12/15] libbpf: add C/LDFLAGS to libbpf.so and test_libpf targets Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-09 20:41 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 13/15] samples/bpf: provide C/LDFLAGS to libbpf Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-09 20:41 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 14/15] samples/bpf: add sysroot support Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-09 20:41 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 15/15] samples/bpf: add preparation steps and sysroot info to readme Ivan Khoronzhuk
2019-10-11 0:00 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 00/15] samples: bpf: improve/fix cross-compilation Daniel Borkmann
2019-10-11 0:29 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191009204134.26960-10-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org \
--to=ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
BPF Archive on lore.kernel.org
Archives are clonable:
git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/0 bpf/git/0.git
# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
public-inbox-init -V2 bpf bpf/ https://lore.kernel.org/bpf \
bpf@vger.kernel.org
public-inbox-index bpf
Example config snippet for mirrors
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.bpf
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git