From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C44CA9EA0 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 16:34:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A4A20663 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 16:34:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1572021285; bh=73ikf2kkUZQjp8PX8Q8Q+iLYlycTaDWO8+AGHBowkho=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=EjQ4OQd8wsU5qrCcJz5dnx5I5vjvg2E/r+OR1URm3R8IgpWuWgQtVrPhXztyZRLm4 UYUbQxr/EoDCYgaOrXoiTwYn3C8KgiqycM453Ak4h3kawiM6NqnlI+esAkRjIjY/zI sCAJ7V9Uvw/qISb5UVQyVyjf5XOV6Bucxf577qEo= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732240AbfJYQep (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:34:45 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f196.google.com ([209.85.160.196]:44067 "EHLO mail-qt1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727811AbfJYQeo (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:34:44 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f196.google.com with SMTP id z22so4099669qtq.11 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:34:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ZzuMoUW9nL3txMEdTJ9XgUATvp+vohOFem7VSLZndxM=; b=V6loMynR51IXK5Uh3Uz8hul19FqYBOTdlPifpgqSVEAM1F4ObmQBhZau93eB5N2RnN nhplMUwzSOmoSFF+fCBbJSnX0wN0ItnKnoUaEeqFE9mwZ1UqxOkX2KuuwZoS4qz3NtlE dE5jxh5cmxNZNz7a97C85o1qoa7sCG2iBo1mI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ZzuMoUW9nL3txMEdTJ9XgUATvp+vohOFem7VSLZndxM=; b=g42wkwBmxzkfws+WNPMKv1/RPj3dbcTzJ7UepaEA1Im/qvS/Q7PoS3YrHWajpuIFjX X/9e8QKcjcD65F1WcnDhtlwz2LT5xfCJK8JSqrJg+zWGzNXPTQYLjSkIMmVF7rk79yfc JD//O1jsC0sbx2eaAaUoSHwcFgCKVOV59QrMjrZD0EEnw/PoOSBHr86H85ZJVcGqcg9Z cRa3iVzY7uOnfeiTtx1tO7aQR0kokLPKE38N3V+ywyZPWPAhqRITM/E5gmXbDLoT2hFB dcmUESEiNll1jNfO/NB69rjnOiQcO8LkN8r2swHyyHpg5iclS0O4wEpeh+AODUWoHLfR ed9w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUA6TDeUcMlxvBW7AFsI019ZBLuu6b17Uwfiz2bPrwxHGVlcYbZ tPEez8Mir/gZppvz4YcEPJS4sA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzjx4j/H27n5mz467dFdm+fjNZTliMh4eTlmkmw+XDgygL3bwC15sAnxfIhgOfBLnHeWtCDrg== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:95d2:: with SMTP id t18mr4258748qvt.50.1572021283754; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:34:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chatter.i7.local (192-0-228-88.cpe.teksavvy.com. [192.0.228.88]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m63sm1327855qkc.72.2019.10.25.09.34.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:34:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:34:41 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: bpf , Network Development , Daniel Borkmann , "David S. Miller" , workflows@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: patch review delays Message-ID: <20191025163441.idjzlnwahoacnhbp@chatter.i7.local> Mail-Followup-To: Alexei Starovoitov , bpf , Network Development , Daniel Borkmann , "David S. Miller" , workflows@vger.kernel.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: bpf-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 07:50:22AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: >The last few days I've experienced long email delivery when I was not >directly cc-ed on patches. >Even right now I see some patches in patchworks, but not in my inbox. >Few folks reported similar issues. >In order for everyone to review the submissions appropriately >I'll be applying only the most obvious patches and >will let others sit in the patchworks a bit longer than usual. >Sorry about that. >Ironic that I'm using email to talk about email delays. > >My understanding that these delays are not vger's fault. If you're receiving them at your gmail address, then it's possible Google is throttling how much mail it allows from vger.kernel.org. At least, that's the usual culprit in my experience (I don't have access to vger, so I can't check this assumption). >Some remediations may be used sporadically, but >we need to accelerate our search of long term solutions. >I think Daniel's l2md: >https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dborkman/l2md.git/ >is a great solution. >It's on my todo list to give it a try, >but I'm not sure how practical for every patch reviewer on this list >to switch to that model. Remember that all lore.kernel.org lists are also available via NNTP, e.g.: nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.bpf I know some people can't use it easily due to NNTP ports being blocked on their corporate networks, but it's another option to receive list mail without waiting for SMTP to unclog itself. >Thoughts? One service I hope to start providing soon is individual public-inbox feeds for developers -- both for receiving and for sending. It would work something like this: - email sent to username@kernel.org is (optionally) automatically added to that developer's individual public-inbox repository, in addition to being forwarded - that repository is made available via gitolite.kernel.org (with read permissions restricted to just that developer) - the developer can pull this repository with l2md alongside any list-specific feeds - the hope is that the future tool we develop would allow integrating these multiple feeds into unified maintainer workflow, as well as provide the developer's individual "outbox.git" repository There are some things that still need to be figured out, such as obvious privacy considerations (public-inbox repositories can be edited to remove messages, but this requires proper hooks on the server-side after receiving a push in order to reindex things). It's one of the topics I hope to discuss next week. -K