bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Lau <kafai@fb.com>
To: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Cc: "bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kernel-team@cloudflare.com" <kernel-team@cloudflare.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC bpf-next 0/5] Extend SOCKMAP to store listening sockets
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 05:52:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191028055247.bh5bctgxfvmr3zjh@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191022113730.29303-1-jakub@cloudflare.com>

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 01:37:25PM +0200, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> This patch set is a follow up on a suggestion from LPC '19 discussions to
> make SOCKMAP (or a new map type derived from it) a generic type for storing
> established as well as listening sockets.
> 
> We found ourselves in need of a map type that keeps references to listening
> sockets when working on making the socket lookup programmable, aka BPF
> inet_lookup [1].  Initially we repurposed REUSEPORT_SOCKARRAY but found it
> problematic to extend due to being tightly coupled with reuseport
> logic (see slides [2]).
> So we've turned our attention to SOCKMAP instead.
> 
> As it turns out the changes needed to make SOCKMAP suitable for storing
> listening sockets are self-contained and have use outside of programming
> the socket lookup. Hence this patch set.
> 
> With these patches SOCKMAP can be used in SK_REUSEPORT BPF programs as a
> drop-in replacement for REUSEPORT_SOCKARRAY for TCP. This can hopefully
> lead to code consolidation between the two map types in the future.
What is the plan for UDP support in sockmap?

> 
> Having said that, the main intention here is to lay groundwork for using
> SOCKMAP in the next iteration of programmable socket lookup patches.
What may be the minimal to get only lookup work for UDP sockmap?
.close() and .unhash()?

> 
> I'm looking for feedback if there's anything fundamentally wrong with
> extending SOCKMAP map type like this that I might have missed.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jakub
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20190828072250.29828-1-jakub@cloudflare.com/
> [2] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__linuxplumbersconf.org_event_4_contributions_487_attachments_238_417_Programmable-5Fsocket-5Flookup-5FLPC-5F19.pdf&d=DwIDAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=VQnoQ7LvghIj0gVEaiQSUw&m=Y-Ap1QuRBsqsu8gATb1wH3rPT89No2mam2qINt1BGDI&s=_sfXVfJhB2eR7znE7-WBk660dQXIBxuDLRi7jvXVpsg&e= 
> 
> 
> Jakub Sitnicki (5):
>   bpf, sockmap: Let BPF helpers use lookup operation on SOCKMAP
>   bpf, sockmap: Allow inserting listening TCP sockets into SOCKMAP
>   bpf, sockmap: Don't let child socket inherit psock or its ops on copy
>   bpf: Allow selecting reuseport socket from a SOCKMAP
>   selftests/bpf: Extend SK_REUSEPORT tests to cover SOCKMAP
> 
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c                         |   6 +-
>  net/core/sock_map.c                           |  11 +-
>  net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c                            |  30 ++++
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile          |   7 +-
>  .../selftests/bpf/test_select_reuseport.c     | 141 ++++++++++++++----
>  .../selftests/bpf/test_select_reuseport.sh    |  14 ++
>  6 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_select_reuseport.sh
> 
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-28  5:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-22 11:37 Jakub Sitnicki
2019-10-22 11:37 ` [RFC bpf-next 1/5] bpf, sockmap: Let BPF helpers use lookup operation on SOCKMAP Jakub Sitnicki
2019-10-24 16:59   ` John Fastabend
2019-10-22 11:37 ` [RFC bpf-next 2/5] bpf, sockmap: Allow inserting listening TCP sockets into SOCKMAP Jakub Sitnicki
2019-10-24 17:06   ` John Fastabend
2019-10-25  9:41     ` Jakub Sitnicki
2019-10-22 11:37 ` [RFC bpf-next 3/5] bpf, sockmap: Don't let child socket inherit psock or its ops on copy Jakub Sitnicki
2019-10-22 11:37 ` [RFC bpf-next 4/5] bpf: Allow selecting reuseport socket from a SOCKMAP Jakub Sitnicki
2019-10-22 11:37 ` [RFC bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: Extend SK_REUSEPORT tests to cover SOCKMAP Jakub Sitnicki
2019-10-24 16:12 ` [RFC bpf-next 0/5] Extend SOCKMAP to store listening sockets Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-24 16:56 ` John Fastabend
2019-10-25  9:26   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2019-10-25 14:18     ` John Fastabend
2019-10-28  5:52 ` Martin Lau [this message]
2019-10-28 12:35   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2019-10-28 19:04     ` John Fastabend
2019-10-29  8:56       ` Jakub Sitnicki
2019-10-28 20:42     ` Martin Lau
2019-10-28 21:05       ` John Fastabend
2019-10-28 21:38         ` Martin Lau
2019-10-29  8:52           ` Jakub Sitnicki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191028055247.bh5bctgxfvmr3zjh@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
    --to=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [RFC bpf-next 0/5] Extend SOCKMAP to store listening sockets' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).