From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73EB7C43141 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 07:16:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454F4208A1 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 07:16:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nvidia.com header.i=@nvidia.com header.b="BN+PST3f" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727014AbfKUHQr (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 02:16:47 -0500 Received: from hqemgate15.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.64]:17804 "EHLO hqemgate15.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727176AbfKUHOE (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 02:14:04 -0500 Received: from hqpgpgate102.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqemgate15.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, DES-CBC3-SHA) id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 23:13:54 -0800 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com ([172.20.161.6]) by hqpgpgate102.nvidia.com (PGP Universal service); Wed, 20 Nov 2019 23:13:58 -0800 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqpgpgate102.nvidia.com on Wed, 20 Nov 2019 23:13:58 -0800 Received: from HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) by HQMAIL111.nvidia.com (172.20.187.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 07:13:57 +0000 Received: from hqnvemgw03.nvidia.com (10.124.88.68) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 07:13:57 +0000 Received: from blueforge.nvidia.com (Not Verified[10.110.48.28]) by hqnvemgw03.nvidia.com with Trustwave SEG (v7,5,8,10121) id ; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 23:13:57 -0800 From: John Hubbard To: Andrew Morton CC: Al Viro , Alex Williamson , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , =?UTF-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn=20T=C3=B6pel?= , Christoph Hellwig , Dan Williams , Daniel Vetter , Dave Chinner , David Airlie , "David S . Miller" , Ira Weiny , Jan Kara , Jason Gunthorpe , Jens Axboe , Jonathan Corbet , =?UTF-8?q?J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me=20Glisse?= , Magnus Karlsson , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Michael Ellerman , Michal Hocko , Mike Kravetz , Paul Mackerras , Shuah Khan , Vlastimil Babka , , , , , , , , , , , , , LKML , John Hubbard Subject: [PATCH v7 23/24] selftests/vm: run_vmtests: invoke gup_benchmark with basic FOLL_PIN coverage Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 23:13:53 -0800 Message-ID: <20191121071354.456618-24-jhubbard@nvidia.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.0 In-Reply-To: <20191121071354.456618-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> References: <20191121071354.456618-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-NVConfidentiality: public Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1574320434; bh=/x1TdCiN4AHV7riFBKV40yDsqqnISHzJ+pPbTJijsU0=; h=X-PGP-Universal:From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:X-Mailer: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:X-NVConfidentiality: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type; b=BN+PST3ffquUSkPWq0lMQ+aWC4m7ax2ZfA1EE2z2CvN6OOI0TwbXYpoM35w8Ibstb LzDd4IqHmBpLXZWGxRMMs0/24c5N7Rs6yrgb8NKMwg/MFI/OIcmvEyTFoju6rxd2uM dEtO/MIYHV+8qy+u6nNBWdHAQPtYjQUheAdkCVNmg1li29PuH7askTSgXJlX4uQwh7 oH+6wkzLufN2cqs+gubaGFYZy9/w9e52yLdLNCOq7NfCtI06N1YDiTXZNikXYsLQDY C9IKh5qRitaKFp8t4Q4iIQJrfMohxxMopR1PjCgCAyWtnOA8k3vWVTktk3o6s7f1Ia SdcMg1CzlS3sA== Sender: bpf-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org It's good to have basic unit test coverage of the new FOLL_PIN behavior. Fortunately, the gup_benchmark unit test is extremely fast (a few milliseconds), so adding it the the run_vmtests suite is going to cause no noticeable change in running time. So, add two new invocations to run_vmtests: 1) Run gup_benchmark with normal get_user_pages(). 2) Run gup_benchmark with pin_user_pages(). This is much like the first call, except that it sets FOLL_PIN. Running these two in quick succession also provide a visual comparison of the running times, which is convenient. The new invocations are fairly early in the run_vmtests script, because with test suites, it's usually preferable to put the shorter, faster tests first, all other things being equal. Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny Signed-off-by: John Hubbard --- tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests b/tools/testing/selftes= ts/vm/run_vmtests index 951c507a27f7..5043347397a6 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests @@ -104,6 +104,28 @@ echo "NOTE: The above hugetlb tests provide minimal co= verage. Use" echo " https://github.com/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs.git for" echo " hugetlb regression testing." =20 +echo "--------------------------------------------" +echo "running 'gup_benchmark -U' (normal/slow gup)" +echo "--------------------------------------------" +./gup_benchmark -U +if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then + echo "[FAIL]" + exitcode=3D1 +else + echo "[PASS]" +fi + +echo "------------------------------------------" +echo "running gup_benchmark -b (pin_user_pages)" +echo "------------------------------------------" +./gup_benchmark -b +if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then + echo "[FAIL]" + exitcode=3D1 +else + echo "[PASS]" +fi + echo "-------------------" echo "running userfaultfd" echo "-------------------" --=20 2.24.0