bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
To: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:BPF (Safe dynamic programs and tools)" 
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	"open list:BPF (Safe dynamic programs and tools)" 
	<bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
	Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>,
	debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libbpf: fix readelf output parsing on powerpc with recent binutils
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 19:25:53 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191210222553.GA4580@calabresa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFxkdAqg6RaGbRrNN3e_nHfHFR-xxzZgjhi5AnppTxxwdg0VyQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 12:58:33PM -0600, Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 3:37 AM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 04:53:26PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> writes:
> > > > On powerpc with recent versions of binutils, readelf outputs an extra
> > > > field when dumping the symbols of an object file. For example:
> > > >
> > > >     35: 0000000000000838    96 FUNC    LOCAL  DEFAULT [<localentry>: 8]     1 btf_is_struct
> > > >
> > > > The extra "[<localentry>: 8]" prevents the GLOBAL_SYM_COUNT variable to
> > > > be computed correctly and causes the checkabi target to fail.
> > > >
> > > > Fix that by looking for the symbol name in the last field instead of the
> > > > 8th one. This way it should also cope with future extra fields.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
> > > > ---
> > > >  tools/lib/bpf/Makefile | 4 ++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Thanks for fixing that, it's been on my very long list of test failures
> > > for a while.
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> >
> > Looks good & also continues to work on x86. Applied, thanks!
> 
> This actually seems to break horribly on PPC64le with binutils 2.33.1
> resulting in:
> Warning: Num of global symbols in sharedobjs/libbpf-in.o (32) does NOT
> match with num of versioned symbols in libbpf.so (184). Please make
> sure all LIBBPF_API symbols are versioned in libbpf.map.
> 
> This is the only arch that fails, with x86/arm/aarch64/s390 all
> building fine.  Reverting this patch allows successful build across
> all arches.
> 
> Justin

Well, I ended up debugging this same issue and had the same fix as Jarno's when
I noticed his fix was already applied.

I just installed a system with the latest binutils, 2.33.1, and it still breaks
without such fix. Can you tell what is the output of the following command on
your system?

readelf -s --wide tools/lib/bpf/sharedobjs/libbpf-in.o | cut -d "@" -f1 | sed 's/_v[0-9]_[0-9]_[0-9].*//' | awk '/GLOBAL/ && /DEFAULT/ && !/UND/ {print $0}' 

Cascardo.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-10 22:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-01 19:57 [PATCH] libbpf: fix readelf output parsing on powerpc with recent binutils Aurelien Jarno
2019-12-02  5:53 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-12-02  9:37   ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-12-10 18:58     ` Justin Forbes
2019-12-10 22:25       ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo [this message]
2019-12-11 15:33         ` Justin Forbes
2019-12-11 16:00           ` Aurelien Jarno
2019-12-11 16:01           ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2019-12-11 16:52             ` Justin Forbes
2019-12-13 10:11               ` [PATCH] libbpf: Fix readelf output parsing for Fedora Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2019-12-13 17:02                 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-12-15 17:42                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-12-12  0:53             ` [PATCH] libbpf: fix readelf output parsing on powerpc with recent binutils Michael Ellerman
2019-12-13 15:39               ` Ben Hutchings

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191210222553.GA4580@calabresa \
    --to=cascardo@canonical.com \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=debian-kernel@lists.debian.org \
    --cc=jmforbes@linuxtx.org \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).