bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] Introduce pinnable bpf_link kernel abstraction
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 07:47:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200304154757.3tydkiteg3vekyth@ast-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h7z44l3z.fsf@toke.dk>

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 08:47:44AM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> >
> >> And what about the case where the link fd is pinned on a bpffs that is
> >> no longer available? I.e., if a netdevice with an XDP program moves
> >> namespaces and no longer has access to the original bpffs, that XDP
> >> program would essentially become immutable?
> >
> > 'immutable' will not be possible.
> > I'm not clear to me how bpffs is going to disappear. What do you mean
> > exactly?
> 
> # stat /sys/fs/bpf | grep Device
> Device: 1fh/31d	Inode: 1013963     Links: 2
> # mkdir /sys/fs/bpf/test; ls /sys/fs/bpf
> test
> # ip netns add test
> # ip netns exec test stat /sys/fs/bpf/test
> stat: cannot stat '/sys/fs/bpf/test': No such file or directory
> # ip netns exec test stat /sys/fs/bpf | grep Device
> Device: 3fh/63d	Inode: 12242       Links: 2
> 
> It's a different bpffs instance inside the netns, so it won't have
> access to anything pinned in the outer one...

Toke, please get your facts straight.

> # stat /sys/fs/bpf | grep Device
> Device: 1fh/31d	Inode: 1013963     Links: 2

Inode != 1 means that this is not bpffs.
I guess this is still sysfs.

> # mkdir /sys/fs/bpf/test; ls /sys/fs/bpf
> test
> # ip netns add test
> # ip netns exec test stat /sys/fs/bpf/test
> stat: cannot stat '/sys/fs/bpf/test': No such file or directory
> # ip netns exec test stat /sys/fs/bpf | grep Device
> Device: 3fh/63d	Inode: 12242       Links: 2

This is your new sysfs after ip netns exec.

netns has nothing do with bpffs despite your claims.

Try this instead:
# mkdir /tmp/bpf
# mount -t bpf bpf /tmp/bpf
# stat /tmp/bpf|grep Device
Device: 1eh/30d	Inode: 1           Links: 2
# stat -f /tmp/bpf|grep Type
    ID: 0        Namelen: 255     Type: bpf_fs
# mkdir /tmp/bpf/test
# ip netns add my
# ip netns exec my stat /tmp/bpf|grep Device
Device: 1eh/30d	Inode: 1           Links: 3
# ip netns exec my stat -f /tmp/bpf|grep Type
    ID: 0        Namelen: 255     Type: bpf_fs
# ip netns exec my ls /tmp/bpf/
test

Having said that we do allow remounting bpffs on top of existing one:
# mount -t bpf bpf /var/aa
# mkdir /var/aa/bb
# stat -f /var/aa/bb|grep Type
    ID: 0        Namelen: 255     Type: bpf_fs
# mount -t bpf bpf /var/aa
# stat -f /var/aa/bb|grep Type
stat: cannot read file system information for '/var/aa/bb': No such file or directory
# umount /var/aa
# stat -f /var/aa/bb|grep Type
    ID: 0        Namelen: 255     Type: bpf_fs

Still that doesn't mean that pinned link is 'immutable'.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-04 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-28 22:39 [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] Introduce pinnable bpf_link kernel abstraction Andrii Nakryiko
2020-02-28 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf: introduce pinnable bpf_link abstraction Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-02 10:13   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-02 18:06     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-02 21:40       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-02 23:37         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-03  2:50   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-03  4:18     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-02-28 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: add bpf_link pinning/unpinning Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-02 10:16   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-02 18:09     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-02 21:45       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-02-28 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: add link pinning selftests Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-02 10:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] Introduce pinnable bpf_link kernel abstraction Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-02 18:05   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-02 22:24     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-02 23:35       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-03  8:12         ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-03  8:12       ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-03-03 15:46         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-03 19:23           ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-03-03 19:46             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-03 20:24               ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-03 20:53                 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-03-03 22:01                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-03 22:27                     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-04  4:36                       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-04  7:47                         ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-04 15:47                           ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2020-03-05 10:37                             ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-05 16:34                               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-05 22:34                                 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-03-05 22:50                                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-05 23:42                                     ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-03-06  8:31                                       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-06 10:25                                         ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-03-06 10:42                                           ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-06 18:09                                           ` David Ahern
2020-03-04 19:41                         ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-03-04 20:45                           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-04 21:24                             ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-03-05  1:07                               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-05  8:16                                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-03-05 11:05                                   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-05 18:13                                     ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-03-09 11:41                                       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-09 18:50                                         ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-03-10 12:22                                           ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-05 16:39                                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-03 22:40                 ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200304154757.3tydkiteg3vekyth@ast-mbp \
    --to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@fb.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).