From: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel-team@cloudflare.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 06/12] bpf: sockmap: simplify sock_map_init_proto
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 11:12:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200309111243.6982-7-lmb@cloudflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200309111243.6982-1-lmb@cloudflare.com>
We can take advantage of the fact that both callers of
sock_map_init_proto are holding a RCU read lock, and
have verified that psock is valid.
Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
---
net/core/sock_map.c | 19 ++++---------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/sock_map.c b/net/core/sock_map.c
index cb240d87e068..edfdce17b951 100644
--- a/net/core/sock_map.c
+++ b/net/core/sock_map.c
@@ -141,28 +141,17 @@ static void sock_map_unref(struct sock *sk, void *link_raw)
}
}
-static int sock_map_init_proto(struct sock *sk)
+static int sock_map_init_proto(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock)
{
- struct sk_psock *psock;
struct proto *prot;
sock_owned_by_me(sk);
- rcu_read_lock();
- psock = sk_psock(sk);
- if (unlikely(!psock)) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
prot = tcp_bpf_get_proto(sk, psock);
- if (IS_ERR(prot)) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (IS_ERR(prot))
return PTR_ERR(prot);
- }
sk_psock_update_proto(sk, psock, prot);
- rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
}
@@ -241,7 +230,7 @@ static int sock_map_link(struct bpf_map *map, struct sk_psock_progs *progs,
if (msg_parser)
psock_set_prog(&psock->progs.msg_parser, msg_parser);
- ret = sock_map_init_proto(sk);
+ ret = sock_map_init_proto(sk, psock);
if (ret < 0)
goto out_drop;
@@ -286,7 +275,7 @@ static int sock_map_link_no_progs(struct bpf_map *map, struct sock *sk)
return -ENOMEM;
}
- ret = sock_map_init_proto(sk);
+ ret = sock_map_init_proto(sk, psock);
if (ret < 0)
sk_psock_put(sk, psock);
return ret;
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-09 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-09 11:12 [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/12] bpf: sockmap, sockhash: support storing UDP sockets Lorenz Bauer
2020-03-09 11:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 01/12] bpf: sockmap: only check ULP for TCP sockets Lorenz Bauer
2020-03-09 11:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 02/12] skmsg: update saved hooks only once Lorenz Bauer
2020-03-09 11:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 03/12] bpf: tcp: move assertions into tcp_bpf_get_proto Lorenz Bauer
2020-03-09 11:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/12] bpf: tcp: guard declarations with CONFIG_NET_SOCK_MSG Lorenz Bauer
2020-03-09 11:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 05/12] bpf: sockmap: move generic sockmap hooks from BPF TCP Lorenz Bauer
2020-03-09 11:12 ` Lorenz Bauer [this message]
2020-03-09 11:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 07/12] bpf: add sockmap hooks for UDP sockets Lorenz Bauer
2020-03-09 11:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 08/12] bpf: sockmap: add UDP support Lorenz Bauer
2020-03-09 11:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 09/12] selftests: bpf: don't listen() on UDP sockets Lorenz Bauer
2020-03-09 11:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 10/12] selftests: bpf: add tests for UDP sockets in sockmap Lorenz Bauer
2020-03-09 11:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 11/12] selftests: bpf: enable UDP sockmap reuseport tests Lorenz Bauer
2020-03-09 11:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 12/12] bpf, doc: update maintainers for L7 BPF Lorenz Bauer
2020-03-09 22:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/12] bpf: sockmap, sockhash: support storing UDP sockets Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200309111243.6982-7-lmb@cloudflare.com \
--to=lmb@cloudflare.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).