From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
osandov@fb.com, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Document bpf_inspect drgn tool
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 18:26:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200313012648.4sttadqm7g52gldw@ast-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200311191440.3988361-1-rdna@fb.com>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 12:14:40PM -0700, Andrey Ignatov wrote:
> It's a follow-up for discussion in [1].
>
> drgn tool bpf_inspect.py was merged to drgn repo in [2]. Document it in
> kernel tree to make BPF developers aware that the tool exists and can
> help with getting BPF state unavailable via UAPI.
>
> For now it's just one tool but the doc is written in a way that allows
> to cover more tools in the future if needed.
>
> Please refer to the doc itself for more details.
>
> The patch was tested by `make htmldocs` and sanity-checking that
> resulting html looks good.
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200228201514.GB51456@rdna-mbp/T/#mefed65e8a98116bd5d07d09a570a3eac46724951
> [2] https://github.com/osandov/drgn/pull/49
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>
> ---
> Documentation/bpf/drgn.rst | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Documentation/bpf/index.rst | 5 +++--
> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/bpf/drgn.rst
Location looks good, but I gotta nit pick on wording...
> diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/drgn.rst b/Documentation/bpf/drgn.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9a9ad75ab066
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/bpf/drgn.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: (LGPL-2.1 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +
> +==============
> +BPF drgn tools
> +==============
> +
> +drgn scripts are great to debug kernel internals including BPF and get
> +information unavailable via conventional kernel UAPI.
> +
> +If there is a piece of kernel state useful for a small number of users, e.g.
> +only for BPF developers, or too expensive to expose to user space, drgn script
> +can be a good option to still have access to that state but without extending
> +UAPI.
Above two paragraphs are true for any piece of kernel data.
I think they're unnecessary focusing attention on bpf.
May be rephrase the whole thing like:
"
drgn scripts is a convenient and easy to use mechanism to retrieve arbitrary
kernel data structures. drgn is not relying on kernel UAPI to read the data.
Instead it's reading directly from /proc/kcore or vmcore and pretty prints the
data based on dwarf debug information from vmlinux.
"
> +
> +This document describes BPF related drgn tools.
> +
> +See `drgn/tools`_ for all tools available at the moment and `drgn/doc`_ for
> +more details on drgn itself.
> +
> +bpf_inspect.py
> +**************
> +
> +`bpf_inspect.py`_ is a tool intended to inspect BPF programs and maps. It can
> +iterate over all programs and maps in the system and print basic information
> +about these objects, including id, type and name.
> +
> +The main use-case `bpf_inspect.py`_ covers is to show BPF programs of types
> +``BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT`` and ``BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING`` attached to other BPF
> +programs via ``freplace``/``fentry``/``fexit`` mechanisms, since there is no
> +user-space API to get this information.
> +
> +But developer can edit the tool and get any piece of ``struct bpf_prog`` or
Just drop 'but' and say 'Any developer can edit ...'
> +``struct bpf_map`` they're interested in, e.g. the whole ``struct
> +bpf_prog_aux``.
> +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-13 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-11 19:14 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Document bpf_inspect drgn tool Andrey Ignatov
2020-03-13 1:26 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2020-03-14 0:35 ` Andrey Ignatov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200313012648.4sttadqm7g52gldw@ast-mbp \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=rdna@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).