From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, ast@fb.com, daniel@iogearbox.net,
rdna@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/6] bpf: implement bpf_prog replacement for an active bpf_cgroup_link
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 08:45:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202003260843.gudxvl48%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200325065746.640559-5-andriin@fb.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2751 bytes --]
Hi Andrii,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]
[cannot apply to bpf/master cgroup/for-next v5.6-rc7 next-20200325]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Andrii-Nakryiko/Add-support-for-cgroup-bpf_link/20200326-055942
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
config: mips-fuloong2e_defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: mips64el-linux-gcc (GCC) 5.5.0
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
GCC_VERSION=5.5.0 make.cross ARCH=mips
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from include/linux/cgroup-defs.h:22:0,
from include/linux/cgroup.h:28,
from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13,
from include/linux/swap.h:9,
from include/linux/suspend.h:5,
from arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.c:17:
>> include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h:382:17: warning: 'struct bpf_link' declared inside parameter list
struct bpf_prog *new_prog)
^
>> include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h:382:17: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
--
In file included from include/linux/cgroup-defs.h:22:0,
from include/linux/cgroup.h:28,
from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13,
from include/linux/swap.h:9,
from include/linux/suspend.h:5,
from arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.c:17:
>> include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h:382:17: warning: 'struct bpf_link' declared inside parameter list
struct bpf_prog *new_prog)
^
>> include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h:382:17: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
20 real 6 user 9 sys 75.80% cpu make prepare
vim +382 include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
379
380 static inline int cgroup_bpf_replace(struct bpf_link *link,
381 struct bpf_prog *old_prog,
> 382 struct bpf_prog *new_prog)
383 {
384 return -EINVAL;
385 }
386
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 19209 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-26 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-25 6:57 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/6] Add support for cgroup bpf_link Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-25 6:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/6] bpf: factor out cgroup storages operations Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-25 6:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/6] bpf: factor out attach_type to prog_type mapping for attach/detach Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-25 6:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 3/6] bpf: implement bpf_link-based cgroup BPF program attachment Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-25 6:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/6] bpf: implement bpf_prog replacement for an active bpf_cgroup_link Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-25 22:57 ` kbuild test robot
2020-03-26 1:28 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-26 0:45 ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2020-03-26 23:35 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-26 23:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-27 0:34 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-27 0:55 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-25 6:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 5/6] libbpf: add support for bpf_link-based cgroup attachment Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-25 6:57 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: test FD-based " Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202003260843.gudxvl48%lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdna@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).