From: KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
Florent Revest <revest@google.com>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>,
James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@chromium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v8 8/8] bpf: lsm: Add Documentation
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 20:28:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200327192854.31150-9-kpsingh@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200327192854.31150-1-kpsingh@chromium.org>
From: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
Document how eBPF programs (BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM) can be loaded and
attached (BPF_LSM_MAC) to the LSM hooks.
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Florent Revest <revest@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>
---
Documentation/bpf/bpf_lsm.rst | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Documentation/bpf/index.rst | 1 +
2 files changed, 143 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/bpf/bpf_lsm.rst
diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/bpf_lsm.rst b/Documentation/bpf/bpf_lsm.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1c0a75a51d79
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/bpf/bpf_lsm.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+.. Copyright (C) 2020 Google LLC.
+
+================
+LSM BPF Programs
+================
+
+These BPF programs allow runtime instrumentation of the LSM hooks by privileged
+users to implement system-wide MAC (Mandatory Access Control) and Audit
+policies using eBPF.
+
+Structure
+---------
+
+The example shows an eBPF program that can be attached to the ``file_mprotect``
+LSM hook:
+
+.. c:function:: int file_mprotect(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long reqprot, unsigned long prot);
+
+Other LSM hooks which can be instrumented can be found in
+``include/linux/lsm_hooks.h``.
+
+eBPF programs that use :doc:`/bpf/btf` do not need to include kernel headers
+for accessing information from the attached eBPF program's context. They can
+simply declare the structures in the eBPF program and only specify the fields
+that need to be accessed.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ struct mm_struct {
+ unsigned long start_brk, brk, start_stack;
+ } __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
+
+ struct vm_area_struct {
+ unsigned long start_brk, brk, start_stack;
+ unsigned long vm_start, vm_end;
+ struct mm_struct *vm_mm;
+ } __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
+
+
+.. note:: The order of the fields is irrelevant.
+
+This can be further simplified (if one has access to the BTF information at
+build time) by generating the ``vmlinux.h`` with:
+
+.. code-block:: console
+
+ # bpftool btf dump file <path-to-btf-vmlinux> format c > vmlinux.h
+
+.. note:: ``path-to-btf-vmlinux`` can be ``/sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux`` if the
+ build environment matches the environment the BPF programs are
+ deployed in.
+
+The ``vmlinux.h`` can then simply be included in the BPF programs without
+requiring the definition of the types.
+
+The eBPF programs can be declared using the``BPF_PROG``
+macros defined in `tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h`_. In this
+example:
+
+ * ``"lsm/file_mprotect"`` indicates the LSM hook that the program must
+ be attached to
+ * ``mprotect_audit`` is the name of the eBPF program
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ SEC("lsm/file_mprotect")
+ int BPF_PROG(mprotect_audit, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ unsigned long reqprot, unsigned long prot, int ret)
+ {
+ /* ret is the return value from the previous BPF program
+ * or 0 if it's the first hook.
+ */
+ if (ret != 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ int is_heap;
+
+ is_heap = (vma->vm_start >= vma->vm_mm->start_brk &&
+ vma->vm_end <= vma->vm_mm->brk);
+
+ /* Return an -EPERM or write information to the perf events buffer
+ * for auditing
+ */
+ if (is_heap)
+ return -EPERM;
+ }
+
+The ``__attribute__((preserve_access_index))`` is a clang feature that allows
+the BPF verifier to update the offsets for the access at runtime using the
+:doc:`/bpf/btf` information. Since the BPF verifier is aware of the types, it
+also validates all the accesses made to the various types in the eBPF program.
+
+Loading
+-------
+
+eBPF programs can be loaded with the :manpage:`bpf(2)` syscall's
+``BPF_PROG_LOAD`` operation:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ struct bpf_object *obj;
+
+ obj = bpf_object__open("./my_prog.o");
+ bpf_object__load(obj);
+
+This can be simplified by using a skeleton header generated by ``bpftool``:
+
+.. code-block:: console
+
+ # bpftool gen skeleton my_prog.o > my_prog.skel.h
+
+and the program can be loaded by including ``my_prog.skel.h`` and using
+the generated helper, ``my_prog__open_and_load``.
+
+Attachment to LSM Hooks
+-----------------------
+
+The LSM allows attachment of eBPF programs as LSM hooks using :manpage:`bpf(2)`
+syscall's ``BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN`` operation or more simply by
+using the libbpf helper ``bpf_program__attach_lsm``.
+
+The program can be detached from the LSM hook by *destroying* the ``link``
+link returned by ``bpf_program__attach_lsm`` using ``bpf_link__destroy``.
+
+One can also use the helpers generated in ``my_prog.skel.h`` i.e.
+``my_prog__attach`` for attachment and ``my_prog__destroy`` for cleaning up.
+
+Examples
+--------
+
+An example eBPF program can be found in
+`tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm.c`_ and the corresponding
+userspace code in `tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c`_
+
+.. Links
+.. _tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h:
+ https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
+.. _tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm.c:
+ https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm.c
+.. _tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c:
+ https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c
diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/index.rst b/Documentation/bpf/index.rst
index 7be43c5f2dcf..f99677f3572f 100644
--- a/Documentation/bpf/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/bpf/index.rst
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ Program types
prog_cgroup_sockopt
prog_cgroup_sysctl
prog_flow_dissector
+ bpf_lsm
Testing and debugging BPF
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-27 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-27 19:28 [PATCH bpf-next v8 0/8] MAC and Audit policy using eBPF (KRSI) KP Singh
2020-03-27 19:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 1/8] bpf: Introduce BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM KP Singh
2020-03-27 19:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 2/8] security: Refactor declaration of LSM hooks KP Singh
2020-03-27 19:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 3/8] bpf: lsm: provide attachment points for BPF LSM programs KP Singh
2020-03-27 19:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 4/8] bpf: lsm: Implement attach, detach and execution KP Singh
2020-03-28 1:08 ` James Morris
2020-03-27 19:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 5/8] bpf: lsm: Initialize the BPF LSM hooks KP Singh
2020-03-27 19:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 6/8] tools/libbpf: Add support for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM KP Singh
2020-03-27 19:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 7/8] bpf: lsm: Add selftests " KP Singh
2020-03-27 19:28 ` KP Singh [this message]
2020-03-28 17:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 0/8] MAC and Audit policy using eBPF (KRSI) Daniel Borkmann
2020-03-28 19:56 ` KP Singh
2020-03-28 21:50 ` Kees Cook
2020-03-28 22:30 ` KP Singh
2020-03-29 0:07 ` KP Singh
2020-03-29 0:15 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200327192854.31150-9-kpsingh@chromium.org \
--to=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jackmanb@chromium.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=jamorris@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=revest@chromium.org \
--cc=revest@google.com \
--cc=thgarnie@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).