From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CE9C43331 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 08:56:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C822078B for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 08:56:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1585731389; bh=pZfkpzV/DA6TJrp3HueXSBW9yxX80ESU1n7+BOkQquc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=Q7YbiQEP1soBDZ7G26BXLEEufaro96Kk0ytWVGiDTgCmgmb0GX+sHxMfPTXx9gaTb mtMpk5OuMalpfEMz7v6xQkIeb1OlArpkq2/eQNz/I8ZQXEqrJ6GYRcDf0oznqWTIln eYuNKda++423r+Qb8A4uSEtpuILsqPC8mWTrepN8= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730333AbgDAI4X (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2020 04:56:23 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:54442 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727322AbgDAI4X (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2020 04:56:23 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 95AB620784; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 08:56:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1585731383; bh=pZfkpzV/DA6TJrp3HueXSBW9yxX80ESU1n7+BOkQquc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Os3MhArKMK5pr15JDTv+GuhUZA2z26WCPoNodnEur3UTs7+7Lwh3XVqLAj2qqcLVM c8DWL6v+4M5n71Cu9YE1IwMSRlNnXg3oN4ieQ7YbnLJ0xfXJRqvgQDolrPzIqrtQxn 42lXpvbIaEju92IXHKsXjfPxVlqShCvg+T44u6j0= Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:56:20 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Daniel Borkmann Cc: Naresh Kamboju , open list , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Guenter Roeck , Shuah Khan , patches@kernelci.org, Ben Hutchings , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, linux- stable , john.fastabend@gmail.com, komachi.yoshiki@gmail.com, Andrii Nakryiko , lukenels@cs.washington.edu, Netdev , bpf Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.5 000/171] 5.5.14-rc2 review Message-ID: <20200401085620.GD2026666@kroah.com> References: <20200331141450.035873853@linuxfoundation.org> <20200401061131.GA1907105@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Sender: bpf-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:03:16AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 4/1/20 8:11 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 04:18:41AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 21:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.5.14 release. > > > > There are 171 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Apr 2020 14:12:02 +0000. > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.5.14-rc2.gz > > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.5.y > > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > Results from Linaro’s test farm. > > > Regressions on x86_64 and i386. > > > > > > selftests bpf test_verifier reports as failed. > > > This test PASSED on v5.5.13 > > > > > > #554/p jgt32: range bound deduction, reg op imm FAIL > > > Failed to load prog 'Success'! > > > R8 unbounded memory access, make sure to bounds check any array access > > > into a map > > > verification time 141 usec > > > stack depth 8 > > > processed 16 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states > > > 1 peak_states 1 mark_read 1 > > > #555/p jgt32: range bound deduction, reg1 op reg2, reg1 unknown FAIL > > > Failed to load prog 'Success'! > > > R8 unbounded memory access, make sure to bounds check any array access > > > into a map > > > verification time 94 usec > > > stack depth 8 > > > processed 17 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states > > > 1 peak_states 1 mark_read 1 > > > #556/p jle32: range bound deduction, reg1 op reg2, reg2 unknown FAIL > > > Failed to load prog 'Success'! > > > R8 unbounded memory access, make sure to bounds check any array access > > > into a map > > > verification time 68 usec > > > stack depth 8 > > > processed 17 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states > > > 1 peak_states 1 mark_read 1 > > > > Can you run 'git bisect' to find the offending patch? > > No need, I'll send you a patch to update the selftests. It's expected that they > fail now due to the revert we had to do, so if this is the only issue it shouldn't > hold up the release. In any case, I'll send them over to you next. Great, thanks for letting me know this isn't a "real" issue :) greg k-h