From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88139C43331 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 14:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E5E2082F for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 14:45:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1585925111; bh=uGwvi105H0ssGaPrwVgCinztP1mJbkKgjLPsSv10N9o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=OC8u+xxmQf1EqCsEJVj4cXlWAX0fTQAlOYEN/9IcHPQ16uxdyv84r4hWzjfS7gs3s 1efzR5Q9OzTPH6VVxr0Xtq2r4pigBK/u85nl3sP/UWG85S4VrurH4Eq5GtSGI+0SrN t+3JE/Dn0SslKhUAzS/BpZKcVvSXYdGo2MtW71aE= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727923AbgDCOpK (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 10:45:10 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-f67.google.com ([209.85.219.67]:38437 "EHLO mail-qv1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727431AbgDCOpK (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 10:45:10 -0400 Received: by mail-qv1-f67.google.com with SMTP id p60so3682279qva.5; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 07:45:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=MqUKZEQW4ktugpJoN6yg32u1OINgXC5Ef9CKI/ulXcE=; b=qHuagVSw8AoY49GuqNt4Gyp4jl3Y5A6Zny5YowwmaLIOfUdkYqgJrdhGbLqAbimiOd IWVRwHVhkr5RChCnMkes71SpREXTrBmXtegDcscwc3bIqR71AJW0Lgxu+I0+Yl5TFmzy akUWBL5VTWVFteCSVIoQRGM8dGqqLIVdX16P+sSXDAZhNrPmnHuOc/lxMlLaIUZ05MrD TxkS3mAR4Kn6N3Z08aEICPf0TNg3yyw/OYdL1SLobcYzYmO3TlUCYSQiVcbyrwo2s/EV I558rvJoaucMCbX7w+2g7eQdntMf+OaN5JtcILeNSEJcKHCa5C3E5HuyrDSUU9MUp3Bn GqrA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=MqUKZEQW4ktugpJoN6yg32u1OINgXC5Ef9CKI/ulXcE=; b=BRxB7EsXrsBZkwaDuS2Lk2RGxO9m3/7xCxV1609IIvMy623IAeVprvq88X98NgEJsG aziyySMiPPCDJknSv/U0FRGDco9l6GNvFh/dJ4pxi6AP5jgDvugMVNabAfH1/rt+Oq7C GqNCq7c00sRuLtlATWuG0s1a7RZL4yd8jjNgC5OalbJvMAAqTkcXPPmmvupsMjSmH1yU krx0lumrTY1lRSuMgAORaH2nTcMXQkYUM7Kx/zHa2NiPSsSEubV/jTeO6eXGu0TMju9h ftU7MnTqXcSdnAg5jGd8pOC2+gnHXj2VpAWYaLhtudCZnnWnNuqeBCkpQsHxo31mBg8r QFLw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubO0RbTtxKUVpT01/79Ewyc9qb9l76oJLCyZMz9PKrjt548Tu6v K3NSCxTsuP/CJmNVK865Hag= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLKMJyOaqljvYwCu2gv/ka32v9q7O0r9h0E8LAU7t2Pefkn+ucevHTCNlTgoA2NZ462wjrbXw== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:a284:: with SMTP id g4mr8384614qva.131.1585925107631; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 07:45:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:10d:c091:480::842b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r3sm6469393qkd.3.2020.04.03.07.45.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 03 Apr 2020 07:45:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 10:45:05 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Konstantin Khlebnikov Cc: Dmitry Yakunin , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net] inet_diag: add cgroup id attribute Message-ID: <20200403144505.GZ162390@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <20200403095627.GA85072@yandex-team.ru> <20200403133817.GW162390@mtj.duckdns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: bpf-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 05:37:17PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > > How would this work with things like inetd? Would it make sense to associate the > > socket on the first actual send/recv? > > First send/recv seems too intrusive. Intrusive in terms of? > Setsockopt to change association to current cgroup (or by id) seems more reasonable. I'm not sure about exposing it as an explicit interface. Thanks. -- tejun