From: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <ast@fb.com>,
<daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/8] bpf: allow bpf_link pinning as read-only and enforce LINK_UPDATE
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 17:09:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200404000948.3980903-3-andriin@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200404000948.3980903-1-andriin@fb.com>
Make it possible to pin bpf_link as read-only to control whether LINK_UPDATE
operation is allowed or not. bpf_links provided through read-only files are
not allowed to perform LINK_UPDATE operations, which this patch starts
enforcing. bpf_map and bpf_prog are still always treated as read-write ones,
just like before.
This is a critical property for bpf_links and is going to be relied upon for
BPF_LINK_GET_FD_BY_ID operation implemented later in the series. GET_FD_BY_ID
will only return read-only links to prevent processes that do not "own"
bpf_link from updating underlying bpf_prog.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 6 +++---
kernel/bpf/inode.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index ea65c3165e4c..3474f8e34a63 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1103,11 +1103,11 @@ void bpf_link_cleanup(struct bpf_link *link, struct file *link_file,
int link_fd);
void bpf_link_inc(struct bpf_link *link);
void bpf_link_put(struct bpf_link *link);
-int bpf_link_new_fd(struct bpf_link *link);
+int bpf_link_new_fd(struct bpf_link *link, int flags);
struct file *bpf_link_new_file(struct bpf_link *link, int *reserved_fd);
-struct bpf_link *bpf_link_get_from_fd(u32 ufd);
+struct bpf_link *bpf_link_get_from_fd(u32 ufd, fmode_t *link_mode);
-int bpf_obj_pin_user(u32 ufd, const char __user *pathname);
+int bpf_obj_pin_user(u32 ufd, const char __user *pathname, int file_flags);
int bpf_obj_get_user(const char __user *pathname, int flags);
int bpf_percpu_hash_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/inode.c b/kernel/bpf/inode.c
index 95087d9f4ed3..3fd71c1e3c33 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/inode.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/inode.c
@@ -66,23 +66,25 @@ static void bpf_any_put(void *raw, enum bpf_type type)
}
}
-static void *bpf_fd_probe_obj(u32 ufd, enum bpf_type *type)
+static void *bpf_fd_probe_obj(u32 ufd, enum bpf_type *type, fmode_t *file_mode)
{
void *raw;
raw = bpf_map_get_with_uref(ufd);
if (!IS_ERR(raw)) {
*type = BPF_TYPE_MAP;
+ *file_mode = O_RDWR;
return raw;
}
raw = bpf_prog_get(ufd);
if (!IS_ERR(raw)) {
*type = BPF_TYPE_PROG;
+ *file_mode = O_RDWR;
return raw;
}
- raw = bpf_link_get_from_fd(ufd);
+ raw = bpf_link_get_from_fd(ufd, file_mode);
if (!IS_ERR(raw)) {
*type = BPF_TYPE_LINK;
return raw;
@@ -407,7 +409,7 @@ static const struct inode_operations bpf_dir_iops = {
};
static int bpf_obj_do_pin(const char __user *pathname, void *raw,
- enum bpf_type type)
+ enum bpf_type type, fmode_t file_mode)
{
struct dentry *dentry;
struct inode *dir;
@@ -419,7 +421,7 @@ static int bpf_obj_do_pin(const char __user *pathname, void *raw,
if (IS_ERR(dentry))
return PTR_ERR(dentry);
- mode = S_IFREG | ((S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR) & ~current_umask());
+ mode = S_IFREG | (ACC_MODE(file_mode) & ~current_umask());
ret = security_path_mknod(&path, dentry, mode, 0);
if (ret)
@@ -449,17 +451,29 @@ static int bpf_obj_do_pin(const char __user *pathname, void *raw,
return ret;
}
-int bpf_obj_pin_user(u32 ufd, const char __user *pathname)
+int bpf_obj_pin_user(u32 ufd, const char __user *pathname, int file_flags)
{
enum bpf_type type;
+ fmode_t file_mode;
void *raw;
int ret;
- raw = bpf_fd_probe_obj(ufd, &type);
+ raw = bpf_fd_probe_obj(ufd, &type, &file_mode);
if (IS_ERR(raw))
return PTR_ERR(raw);
- ret = bpf_obj_do_pin(pathname, raw, type);
+ if ((type == BPF_TYPE_MAP || type == BPF_TYPE_PROG) && file_flags)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* requested pinned file mode has to be a valid subset */
+ if (!file_flags) {
+ file_flags = file_mode;
+ } else if ((file_mode & file_flags) != file_flags) {
+ bpf_any_put(raw, type);
+ return -EPERM;
+ }
+
+ ret = bpf_obj_do_pin(pathname, raw, type, file_flags);
if (ret != 0)
bpf_any_put(raw, type);
@@ -518,7 +532,7 @@ int bpf_obj_get_user(const char __user *pathname, int flags)
else if (type == BPF_TYPE_MAP)
ret = bpf_map_new_fd(raw, f_flags);
else if (type == BPF_TYPE_LINK)
- ret = bpf_link_new_fd(raw);
+ ret = bpf_link_new_fd(raw, f_flags);
else
return -ENOENT;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 40993d8c936e..47f323901ed9 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -2167,10 +2167,11 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
static int bpf_obj_pin(const union bpf_attr *attr)
{
- if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_OBJ) || attr->file_flags != 0)
+ if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_OBJ))
return -EINVAL;
- return bpf_obj_pin_user(attr->bpf_fd, u64_to_user_ptr(attr->pathname));
+ return bpf_obj_pin_user(attr->bpf_fd, u64_to_user_ptr(attr->pathname),
+ attr->file_flags);
}
static int bpf_obj_get(const union bpf_attr *attr)
@@ -2294,9 +2295,10 @@ const struct file_operations bpf_link_fops = {
.write = bpf_dummy_write,
};
-int bpf_link_new_fd(struct bpf_link *link)
+int bpf_link_new_fd(struct bpf_link *link, int flags)
{
- return anon_inode_getfd("bpf-link", &bpf_link_fops, link, O_CLOEXEC);
+ return anon_inode_getfd("bpf-link", &bpf_link_fops, link,
+ flags | O_CLOEXEC);
}
/* Similar to bpf_link_new_fd, create anon_inode for given bpf_link, but
@@ -2316,7 +2318,8 @@ struct file *bpf_link_new_file(struct bpf_link *link, int *reserved_fd)
if (fd < 0)
return ERR_PTR(fd);
- file = anon_inode_getfile("bpf_link", &bpf_link_fops, link, O_CLOEXEC);
+ file = anon_inode_getfile("bpf_link", &bpf_link_fops, link,
+ O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC);
if (IS_ERR(file)) {
put_unused_fd(fd);
return file;
@@ -2326,7 +2329,7 @@ struct file *bpf_link_new_file(struct bpf_link *link, int *reserved_fd)
return file;
}
-struct bpf_link *bpf_link_get_from_fd(u32 ufd)
+struct bpf_link *bpf_link_get_from_fd(u32 ufd, fmode_t *link_mode)
{
struct fd f = fdget(ufd);
struct bpf_link *link;
@@ -2340,6 +2343,8 @@ struct bpf_link *bpf_link_get_from_fd(u32 ufd)
link = f.file->private_data;
bpf_link_inc(link);
+ if (link_mode)
+ *link_mode = f.file->f_mode;
fdput(f);
return link;
@@ -3612,6 +3617,7 @@ static int link_update(union bpf_attr *attr)
{
struct bpf_prog *old_prog = NULL, *new_prog;
struct bpf_link *link;
+ fmode_t link_mode;
u32 flags;
int ret;
@@ -3625,10 +3631,16 @@ static int link_update(union bpf_attr *attr)
if (flags & ~BPF_F_REPLACE)
return -EINVAL;
- link = bpf_link_get_from_fd(attr->link_update.link_fd);
+ link = bpf_link_get_from_fd(attr->link_update.link_fd, &link_mode);
if (IS_ERR(link))
return PTR_ERR(link);
+ /* read-only link references are not allowed to perform LINK_UPDATE */
+ if (!(link_mode & O_WRONLY)) {
+ bpf_link_put(link);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+
new_prog = bpf_prog_get(attr->link_update.new_prog_fd);
if (IS_ERR(new_prog))
return PTR_ERR(new_prog);
--
2.24.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-04 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-04 0:09 [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/8] bpf_link observability APIs Andrii Nakryiko
2020-04-04 0:09 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/8] bpf: refactor bpf_link update handling Andrii Nakryiko
2020-04-04 0:09 ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2020-04-04 0:09 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 3/8] bpf: allocate ID for bpf_link Andrii Nakryiko
2020-04-04 0:09 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 4/8] bpf: support GET_FD_BY_ID and GET_NEXT_ID " Andrii Nakryiko
2020-04-06 11:34 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-04-06 19:06 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-04-08 15:14 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-04-08 20:23 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-04-08 21:21 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-04-09 18:49 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-04-14 10:32 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-04-14 18:47 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-04-15 9:26 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-04-04 0:09 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 5/8] bpf: add support for BPF_OBJ_GET_INFO_BY_FD " Andrii Nakryiko
2020-04-06 11:34 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-04-06 18:58 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-04-04 0:09 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 6/8] libbpf: add low-level APIs for new bpf_link commands Andrii Nakryiko
2020-04-04 0:09 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 7/8] bpftool: expose attach_type-to-string array to non-cgroup code Andrii Nakryiko
2020-04-04 0:09 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 8/8] bpftool: add bpf_link show and pin support Andrii Nakryiko
2020-04-08 23:44 ` David Ahern
2020-04-09 18:50 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-04-05 16:26 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/8] bpf_link observability APIs David Ahern
2020-04-05 18:31 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200404000948.3980903-3-andriin@fb.com \
--to=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).