From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C7BC433E0 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 17:46:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC120206E2 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 17:46:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726019AbgFBRqP (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2020 13:46:15 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:42724 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725969AbgFBRqP (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2020 13:46:15 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 052HY4In085624; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 13:46:03 -0400 Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 31dj9nu0xe-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 02 Jun 2020 13:46:03 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 052HeKON007325; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 17:46:01 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 31bf47xgef-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 02 Jun 2020 17:46:01 +0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 052HjwNN50331718 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 2 Jun 2020 17:45:58 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C31A4068; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 17:45:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9313A4062; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 17:45:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.145.174.225]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 17:45:57 +0000 (GMT) From: Ilya Leoshkevich To: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Sumanth Korikkar , Ilya Leoshkevich Subject: [PATCH bpf] s390/bpf: Use bcr 0,%0 as tail call nop filler Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 19:45:55 +0200 Message-Id: <20200602174555.2501389-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216,18.0.687 definitions=2020-06-02_13:2020-06-02,2020-06-02 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2006020123 Sender: bpf-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org Currently used 0x0000 filler confuses bfd disassembler, making bpftool prog dump xlated output nearly useless. Fix by using a real instruction. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich --- arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 0f37a1b635f8..f4242b894cf2 100644 --- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -503,7 +503,8 @@ static void bpf_jit_prologue(struct bpf_jit *jit, u32 stack_depth) } else { /* j tail_call_start: NOP if no tail calls are used */ EMIT4_PCREL(0xa7f40000, 6); - _EMIT2(0); + /* bcr 0,%0 */ + EMIT2(0x0700, 0, REG_0); } /* Tail calls have to skip above initialization */ jit->tail_call_start = jit->prg; -- 2.25.4