From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F65C433DF for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 06:47:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7423B20675 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 06:47:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726788AbgGGGrd (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 02:47:33 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:57348 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725825AbgGGGrd (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 02:47:33 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id AD38268AFE; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 08:47:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 08:47:30 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jonathan Lemon Cc: Christoph Hellwig , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_T=F6pel?= , Magnus Karlsson , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dma-mapping: add a new dma_need_sync API Message-ID: <20200707064730.GA23602@lst.de> References: <20200629130359.2690853-1-hch@lst.de> <20200629130359.2690853-2-hch@lst.de> <20200706194227.vfhv5o4lporxjxmq@bsd-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200706194227.vfhv5o4lporxjxmq@bsd-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: bpf-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 12:42:27PM -0700, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 03:03:56PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Add a new API to check if calls to dma_sync_single_for_{device,cpu} are > > required for a given DMA streaming mapping. > > > > +:: > > + > > + bool > > + dma_need_sync(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr); > > + > > +Returns %true if dma_sync_single_for_{device,cpu} calls are required to > > +transfer memory ownership. Returns %false if those calls can be skipped. > > Hi Christoph - > > Thie call above is for a specific dma_addr. For correctness, would I > need to check every addr, or can I assume that for a specific memory > type (pages returned from malloc), that the answer would be identical? You need to check every mapping. E.g. this API pairs with a dma_map_single/page call. For S/G mappings you'd need to call it for each entry, although if you have a use case for that we really should add a dma_sg_need_sync helper instea of open coding the scatterlist walk.