From: KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/4] bpf: Implement bpf_local_storage for inodes
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 00:59:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200715225911.GA1194150@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200715215751.6llgungzff66iwxh@kafai-mbp>
On 15-Jul 14:57, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 12:12:37PM +0200, KP Singh wrote:
> > From: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
> >
> > Similar to bpf_local_storage for sockets, add local storage for inodes.
> > The life-cycle of storage is managed with the life-cycle of the inode.
> > i.e. the storage is destroyed along with the owning inode.
> >
> > The BPF LSM allocates an __rcu pointer to the bpf_local_storage in the
> > security blob which are now stackable and can co-exist with other LSMs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
>
> [ ... ]
>
>
> > +static void *bpf_inode_storage_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
> > +{
> > + struct bpf_local_storage_data *sdata;
> > + struct inode *inode;
> > + int err = -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (key) {
> > + inode = *(struct inode **)(key);
> The bpf_inode_storage_lookup_elem() here and the (update|delete)_elem() below
> are called from the userspace syscall. How the userspace may provide this key?
I realized this when I replied about the _fd_ name in the sk helpers.
I am going to mark them as unsupported for now for inodes.
We could, probably and separately, use a combination of the device
and inode number as a key from userspace.
- KP
>
> > + sdata = inode_storage_lookup(inode, map, true);
> > + return sdata ? sdata->data : NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ERR_PTR(err);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int bpf_inode_storage_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
> > + void *value, u64 map_flags)
> > +{
> > + struct bpf_local_storage_data *sdata;
> > + struct inode *inode;
> > + int err = -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (key) {
> > + inode = *(struct inode **)(key);
> > + sdata = map->ops->map_local_storage_update(inode, map, value,
> > + map_flags);
> > + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(sdata);
> > + }
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int inode_storage_delete(struct inode *inode, struct bpf_map *map)
> > +{
> > + struct bpf_local_storage_data *sdata;
> > +
> > + sdata = inode_storage_lookup(inode, map, false);
> > + if (!sdata)
> > + return -ENOENT;
> > +
> > + bpf_selem_unlink_map_elem(SELEM(sdata));
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int bpf_inode_storage_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
> > +{
> > + struct inode *inode;
> > + int err = -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (key) {
> > + inode = *(struct inode **)(key);
> > + err = inode_storage_delete(inode, map);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > +static int inode_storage_map_btf_id;
> > +const struct bpf_map_ops inode_storage_map_ops = {
> > + .map_alloc_check = bpf_local_storage_map_alloc_check,
> > + .map_alloc = inode_storage_map_alloc,
> > + .map_free = inode_storage_map_free,
> > + .map_get_next_key = notsupp_get_next_key,
> > + .map_lookup_elem = bpf_inode_storage_lookup_elem,
> > + .map_update_elem = bpf_inode_storage_update_elem,
> > + .map_delete_elem = bpf_inode_storage_delete_elem,
> > + .map_check_btf = bpf_local_storage_map_check_btf,
> > + .map_btf_name = "bpf_local_storage_map",
> > + .map_btf_id = &inode_storage_map_btf_id,
> > + .map_local_storage_alloc = inode_storage_alloc,
> > + .map_selem_alloc = inode_selem_alloc,
> > + .map_local_storage_update = inode_storage_update,
> > + .map_local_storage_unlink = unlink_inode_storage,
> > +};
> > +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-15 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-09 10:12 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/4] Generalizing bpf_local_storage KP Singh
2020-07-09 10:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/4] bpf: Generalize bpf_sk_storage KP Singh
2020-07-10 6:59 ` Martin KaFai Lau
[not found] ` <CACYkzJ7szyY8vY=Rv_gr7RbMty=pxyZpPPzTpaREAa5_k0tAfg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20200715064339.gxtb4qwl77macuxt@kafai-mbp>
[not found] ` <CACYkzJ7GmSPt8WV5nSNB2irH+Dn9QywSabZyLvqEcae2-jTuHQ@mail.gmail.com>
2020-07-15 8:57 ` KP Singh
2020-07-20 11:18 ` kernel test robot
2020-07-09 10:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/4] bpf: Implement bpf_local_storage for inodes KP Singh
2020-07-15 21:57 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2020-07-15 22:59 ` KP Singh [this message]
2020-07-20 22:44 ` KP Singh
2020-07-09 10:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/4] bpf: Allow local storage to be used from LSM programs KP Singh
2020-07-09 10:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/4] bpf: Add selftests for local_storage KP Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200715225911.GA1194150@google.com \
--to=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=revest@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).