From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
bjorn.topel@intel.com, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 3/6] bpf: rename poke descriptor's 'ip' member to 'tailcall_target'
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:35:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200724173557.5764-4-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200724173557.5764-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Reflect the actual purpose of poke->ip and rename it to
poke->tailcall_target so that it will not the be confused with another
poke target that will be introduced in next commit.
While at it, do the same thing with poke->ip_stable - rename it to
poke->tailcall_target_stable.
Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
include/linux/bpf.h | 4 ++--
kernel/bpf/arraymap.c | 17 +++++++++--------
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 5b3f19799efb..44e64d406055 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ static void emit_bpf_tail_call_direct(struct bpf_jit_poke_descriptor *poke,
EMIT3(0x83, 0xC0, 0x01); /* add eax, 1 */
EMIT2_off32(0x89, 0x85, -36 - MAX_BPF_STACK); /* mov dword ptr [rbp -548], eax */
- poke->ip = image + (addr - X86_PATCH_SIZE);
+ poke->tailcall_target = image + (addr - X86_PATCH_SIZE);
poke->adj_off = PROLOGUE_SIZE;
memcpy(prog, ideal_nops[NOP_ATOMIC5], X86_PATCH_SIZE);
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ static void bpf_tail_call_direct_fixup(struct bpf_prog *prog)
for (i = 0; i < prog->aux->size_poke_tab; i++) {
poke = &prog->aux->poke_tab[i];
- WARN_ON_ONCE(READ_ONCE(poke->ip_stable));
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(READ_ONCE(poke->tailcall_target_stable));
if (poke->reason != BPF_POKE_REASON_TAIL_CALL)
continue;
@@ -464,18 +464,20 @@ static void bpf_tail_call_direct_fixup(struct bpf_prog *prog)
if (target) {
/* Plain memcpy is used when image is not live yet
* and still not locked as read-only. Once poke
- * location is active (poke->ip_stable), any parallel
- * bpf_arch_text_poke() might occur still on the
- * read-write image until we finally locked it as
- * read-only. Both modifications on the given image
- * are under text_mutex to avoid interference.
+ * location is active (poke->tailcall_target_stable),
+ * any parallel bpf_arch_text_poke() might occur
+ * still on the read-write image until we finally
+ * locked it as read-only. Both modifications on
+ * the given image are under text_mutex to avoid
+ * interference.
*/
- ret = __bpf_arch_text_poke(poke->ip, BPF_MOD_JUMP, NULL,
+ ret = __bpf_arch_text_poke(poke->tailcall_target,
+ BPF_MOD_JUMP, NULL,
(u8 *)target->bpf_func +
poke->adj_off, false);
BUG_ON(ret < 0);
}
- WRITE_ONCE(poke->ip_stable, true);
+ WRITE_ONCE(poke->tailcall_target_stable, true);
mutex_unlock(&array->aux->poke_mutex);
}
}
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 72221aea1c60..aaa035519360 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -652,14 +652,14 @@ enum bpf_jit_poke_reason {
/* Descriptor of pokes pointing /into/ the JITed image. */
struct bpf_jit_poke_descriptor {
- void *ip;
+ void *tailcall_target;
union {
struct {
struct bpf_map *map;
u32 key;
} tail_call;
};
- bool ip_stable;
+ bool tailcall_target_stable;
u8 adj_off;
u16 reason;
};
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
index c66e8273fccd..6fe6491fa17a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
@@ -770,12 +770,13 @@ static void prog_array_map_poke_run(struct bpf_map *map, u32 key,
* there could be danger of use after free otherwise.
* 2) Initially when we start tracking aux, the program
* is not JITed yet and also does not have a kallsyms
- * entry. We skip these as poke->ip_stable is not
- * active yet. The JIT will do the final fixup before
- * setting it stable. The various poke->ip_stable are
- * successively activated, so tail call updates can
- * arrive from here while JIT is still finishing its
- * final fixup for non-activated poke entries.
+ * entry. We skip these as poke->tailcall_target_stable
+ * is not active yet. The JIT will do the final fixup
+ * before setting it stable. The various
+ * poke->tailcall_target_stable are successively
+ * activated, so tail call updates can arrive from here
+ * while JIT is still finishing its final fixup for
+ * non-activated poke entries.
* 3) On program teardown, the program's kallsym entry gets
* removed out of RCU callback, but we can only untrack
* from sleepable context, therefore bpf_arch_text_poke()
@@ -792,7 +793,7 @@ static void prog_array_map_poke_run(struct bpf_map *map, u32 key,
* 5) Any other error happening below from bpf_arch_text_poke()
* is a unexpected bug.
*/
- if (!READ_ONCE(poke->ip_stable))
+ if (!READ_ONCE(poke->tailcall_target_stable))
continue;
if (poke->reason != BPF_POKE_REASON_TAIL_CALL)
continue;
@@ -800,7 +801,7 @@ static void prog_array_map_poke_run(struct bpf_map *map, u32 key,
poke->tail_call.key != key)
continue;
- ret = bpf_arch_text_poke(poke->ip, BPF_MOD_JUMP,
+ ret = bpf_arch_text_poke(poke->tailcall_target, BPF_MOD_JUMP,
old ? (u8 *)old->bpf_func +
poke->adj_off : NULL,
new ? (u8 *)new->bpf_func +
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-24 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-24 17:35 [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/6] bpf: tailcalls in BPF subprograms Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-07-24 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 1/6] bpf, x64: use %rcx instead of %rax for tail call retpolines Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-07-24 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 2/6] bpf: propagate poke descriptors to subprograms Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-07-24 17:35 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2020-07-24 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 4/6] bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall handling in JIT Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-07-28 21:33 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-07-28 22:07 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-07-29 16:10 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-07-29 21:10 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-07-30 20:16 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-07-30 22:58 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-07-24 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 5/6] bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms for x64 JIT Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-07-24 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 6/6] selftests: bpf: add dummy prog for bpf2bpf with tailcall Maciej Fijalkowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200724173557.5764-4-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).