From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 30/35] bpf: bpftool: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 11:45:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200727184506.2279656-31-guro@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200727184506.2279656-1-guro@fb.com>
Since bpf stopped using memlock rlimit to limit the memory usage,
there is no more reason for bpftool to alter its own limits.
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c | 7 -------
tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c | 2 --
tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h | 2 --
tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c | 2 --
tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c | 1 -
tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 3 ---
tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c | 2 --
7 files changed, 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
index 65303664417e..01b87e8c3040 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
@@ -109,13 +109,6 @@ static bool is_bpffs(char *path)
return (unsigned long)st_fs.f_type == BPF_FS_MAGIC;
}
-void set_max_rlimit(void)
-{
- struct rlimit rinf = { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY };
-
- setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rinf);
-}
-
static int
mnt_fs(const char *target, const char *type, char *buff, size_t bufflen)
{
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
index 1cd75807673e..2d6c6bff934e 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
@@ -885,8 +885,6 @@ static int do_probe(int argc, char **argv)
__u32 ifindex = 0;
char *ifname;
- set_max_rlimit();
-
while (argc) {
if (is_prefix(*argv, "kernel")) {
if (target != COMPONENT_UNSPEC) {
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
index e3a79b5a9960..0a3bd1ff14da 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
@@ -95,8 +95,6 @@ int detect_common_prefix(const char *arg, ...);
void fprint_hex(FILE *f, void *arg, unsigned int n, const char *sep);
void usage(void) __noreturn;
-void set_max_rlimit(void);
-
int mount_tracefs(const char *target);
struct pinned_obj_table {
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
index 3a27d31a1856..f08b9e707511 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
@@ -1315,8 +1315,6 @@ static int do_create(int argc, char **argv)
return -1;
}
- set_max_rlimit();
-
fd = bpf_create_map_xattr(&attr);
if (fd < 0) {
p_err("map create failed: %s", strerror(errno));
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c
index e3b116325403..4c559a8ae4e8 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c
@@ -96,7 +96,6 @@ int build_obj_refs_table(struct obj_refs_table *table, enum bpf_obj_type type)
libbpf_print_fn_t default_print;
hash_init(table->table);
- set_max_rlimit();
skel = pid_iter_bpf__open();
if (!skel) {
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
index 3e6ecc6332e2..40e50db60332 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
@@ -1291,8 +1291,6 @@ static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
}
}
- set_max_rlimit();
-
obj = bpf_object__open_file(file, &open_opts);
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(obj)) {
p_err("failed to open object file");
@@ -1833,7 +1831,6 @@ static int do_profile(int argc, char **argv)
}
}
- set_max_rlimit();
err = profiler_bpf__load(profile_obj);
if (err) {
p_err("failed to load profile_obj");
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c
index b58b91f62ffb..0915e1e9b7c0 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c
@@ -498,8 +498,6 @@ static int do_register(int argc, char **argv)
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(obj))
return -1;
- set_max_rlimit();
-
load_attr.obj = obj;
if (verifier_logs)
/* log_level1 + log_level2 + stats, but not stable UAPI */
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-27 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-27 18:44 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/35] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-07-27 22:11 ` Song Liu
2020-07-28 0:08 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 4:42 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-27 22:12 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-27 22:30 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-27 22:48 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-27 23:05 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-27 23:35 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-27 23:36 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-27 23:55 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-07-27 23:56 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/35] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for socket storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-27 23:57 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-27 23:58 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/35] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 0:01 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 13/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 0:04 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 14/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf_struct_ops maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 5:29 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 15/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 5:30 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 16/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 5:31 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 17/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 5:31 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 18/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 5:32 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 19/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 5:32 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 20/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack_maps maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 5:35 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 21/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for reuseport_array maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 5:36 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 22/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 5:37 ` Song Liu
2020-07-28 5:56 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 23/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 5:37 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 24/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 5:38 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 25/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for socket storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 5:41 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 26/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 5:42 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 27/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 5:47 ` Song Liu
2020-07-28 5:58 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-28 6:06 ` Song Liu
2020-07-28 19:08 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 19:16 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-27 18:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 28/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 5:55 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 29/35] bpf: libbpf: cleanup RLIMIT_MEMLOCK usage Roman Gushchin
2020-07-27 22:05 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-27 22:44 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 23:15 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 5:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-30 1:38 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 19:39 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-30 20:46 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-07-27 18:45 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2020-07-28 6:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 30/35] bpf: bpftool: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Song Liu
2020-07-28 6:00 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-27 18:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 31/35] bpf: runqslower: don't " Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 6:03 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-27 18:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 32/35] bpf: selftests: delete bpf_rlimit.h Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 6:06 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-28 6:11 ` Song Liu
2020-07-28 18:30 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-27 18:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 33/35] bpf: selftests: don't touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 6:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-27 18:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 34/35] bpf: samples: do not " Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 6:14 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 18:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 35/35] perf: don't " Roman Gushchin
2020-07-28 6:09 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-28 12:13 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200727184506.2279656-31-guro@fb.com \
--to=guro@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).