From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 21/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for reuseport_array maps
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 14:23:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200730212310.2609108-22-guro@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200730212310.2609108-1-guro@fb.com>
Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for reuseport_array maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
---
kernel/bpf/reuseport_array.c | 12 ++----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/reuseport_array.c b/kernel/bpf/reuseport_array.c
index 90b29c5b1da7..9d0161fdfec7 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/reuseport_array.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/reuseport_array.c
@@ -150,9 +150,8 @@ static void reuseport_array_free(struct bpf_map *map)
static struct bpf_map *reuseport_array_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
{
- int err, numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
+ int numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
struct reuseport_array *array;
- struct bpf_map_memory mem;
u64 array_size;
if (!bpf_capable())
@@ -161,20 +160,13 @@ static struct bpf_map *reuseport_array_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
array_size = sizeof(*array);
array_size += (u64)attr->max_entries * sizeof(struct sock *);
- err = bpf_map_charge_init(&mem, array_size);
- if (err)
- return ERR_PTR(err);
-
/* allocate all map elements and zero-initialize them */
array = bpf_map_area_alloc(array_size, numa_node);
- if (!array) {
- bpf_map_charge_finish(&mem);
+ if (!array)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- }
/* copy mandatory map attributes */
bpf_map_init_from_attr(&array->map, attr);
- bpf_map_charge_move(&array->map.memory, &mem);
return &array->map;
}
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-30 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-30 21:22 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/29] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/29] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-07-31 22:48 ` Song Liu
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/29] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/29] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/29] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/29] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/29] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/29] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/29] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/29] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/29] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for socket storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/29] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/29] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf_struct_ops maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 15/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 16/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 17/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 18/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 19/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 20/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack_maps maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:23 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2020-07-30 21:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 22/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 23/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 24/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 25/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for socket storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 26/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 27/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-07-31 22:47 ` Song Liu
2020-07-30 21:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 28/29] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-07-30 21:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 29/29] bpf: samples: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Roman Gushchin
2020-08-03 12:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/29] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Daniel Borkmann
2020-08-03 15:34 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-08-03 16:39 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-08-03 17:05 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-08-03 18:37 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-08-03 19:06 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200730212310.2609108-22-guro@fb.com \
--to=guro@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).