From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 26/30] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for socket storage maps
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 08:01:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200821150134.2581465-27-guro@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200821150134.2581465-1-guro@fb.com>
Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for socket storage maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
---
net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c | 11 -----------
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
index 806b7a9f836e..bc378ce499f4 100644
--- a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
+++ b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
@@ -676,8 +676,6 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_sk_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
struct bpf_sk_storage_map *smap;
unsigned int i;
u32 nbuckets;
- u64 cost;
- int ret;
smap = kzalloc(sizeof(*smap), GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
if (!smap)
@@ -688,18 +686,9 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_sk_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
/* Use at least 2 buckets, select_bucket() is undefined behavior with 1 bucket */
nbuckets = max_t(u32, 2, nbuckets);
smap->bucket_log = ilog2(nbuckets);
- cost = sizeof(*smap->buckets) * nbuckets + sizeof(*smap);
-
- ret = bpf_map_charge_init(&smap->map.memory, cost);
- if (ret < 0) {
- kfree(smap);
- return ERR_PTR(ret);
- }
-
smap->buckets = kvcalloc(sizeof(*smap->buckets), nbuckets,
GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
if (!smap->buckets) {
- bpf_map_charge_finish(&smap->map.memory);
kfree(smap);
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-21 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-21 15:01 [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/30] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 01/30] mm: support nesting memalloc_use_memcg() Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 16:29 ` Shakeel Butt
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 02/30] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-08-25 19:00 ` Shakeel Butt
2020-08-25 22:26 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 03/30] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-25 23:27 ` Shakeel Butt
2020-08-26 2:38 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 04/30] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-27 1:19 ` Shakeel Butt
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 05/30] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-27 1:24 ` Shakeel Butt
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 06/30] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-27 1:25 ` Shakeel Butt
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 07/30] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-27 1:38 ` Shakeel Butt
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 08/30] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-28 16:44 ` Shakeel Butt
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 09/30] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 10/30] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 11/30] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for socket storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 12/30] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 13/30] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 14/30] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 15/30] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf_struct_ops maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 16/30] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 17/30] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 18/30] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 19/30] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 20/30] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 21/30] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack_maps maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 22/30] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for reuseport_array maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 23/30] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 24/30] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 25/30] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 27/30] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 28/30] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 18:23 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-08-21 23:15 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 29/30] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 15:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 30/30] bpf: samples: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Roman Gushchin
2020-08-21 22:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 00/30] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200821150134.2581465-27-guro@fb.com \
--to=guro@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).