From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D33C43461 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 18:50:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A51D206B8 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 18:50:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1599245424; bh=VCLWBRtgGFFIevAtuNkp7sXJXXOh2ElWVKnbEuz7028=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=rPF9PRhWsVbye1ggu2awcE76OYIGZ5lmbCgk/7XneO6KRYxgYDIQgTULsah2It2+N 4skmfSO5I4tIAptPYR2LbKl4WShVvwkzZC6KAEYguxGEZrIOUzZcm+eyEe5MMed1iZ /1IiDzArF6SfxWicwChUzMycoDE9hiLQjxcE6a6w= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726938AbgIDSuU (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Sep 2020 14:50:20 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:54336 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726135AbgIDSuP (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Sep 2020 14:50:15 -0400 Received: from quaco.ghostprotocols.net (unknown [179.97.37.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2487920665; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 18:50:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1599245415; bh=VCLWBRtgGFFIevAtuNkp7sXJXXOh2ElWVKnbEuz7028=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=IkKyMDnc2bVRAEON6+yxtIzWGqkojucKh55fuxOr9UqtZAgP9TDUE19+rDRpkszkf lWVjqkqcPVT3QWXSqCeP8mC+wN76qO2toh5jySLM+gMVJCtGlEa2gjvQoWKVzYqPs7 vwNgLIFeEZqgdWuyUG7G4tAnNjbFDuvAsyI1HX8g= Received: by quaco.ghostprotocols.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4A24C40D3D; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 15:50:13 -0300 (-03) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 15:50:13 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ian Rogers Cc: Jiri Olsa , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Namhyung Kim , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Andrii Nakryiko , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Adrian Hunter , Andi Kleen , Athira Rajeev , LKML , Networking , bpf , Stephane Eranian Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] perf record: Prevent override of attr->sample_period for libpfm4 events Message-ID: <20200904185013.GA3752059@kernel.org> References: <20200728085734.609930-1-irogers@google.com> <20200728085734.609930-3-irogers@google.com> <20200728155940.GC1319041@krava> <20200728160954.GD1319041@krava> <20200904160303.GD939481@krava> <20200904184803.GA3749996@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200904184803.GA3749996@kernel.org> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com Sender: bpf-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org Em Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 03:48:03PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > Em Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 09:22:10AM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu: > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 9:03 AM Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:41:14PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:24 PM Ian Rogers wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 9:10 AM Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 05:59:46PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 01:57:31AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > > > > > > [jolsa@krava perf]$ sudo ./perf test 17 -v > > > > > > 17: Setup struct perf_event_attr : > > > > > > > running './tests/attr/test-record-C0' > > > > > > expected sample_period=4000, got 3000 > > > > > > FAILED './tests/attr/test-record-C0' - match failure > > > > > > I'm not able to reproduce this. Do you have a build configuration or > > > > > something else to look at? The test doesn't seem obviously connected > > > > > with this patch. > > > > > Jiri, any update? Thanks, > > > > sorry, I rebased and ran it again and it passes for me now, > > > so it got fixed along the way > > > No worries, thanks for the update! It'd be nice to land this and the > > other libpfm fixes. > > I applied it and it generated this regression: > > FAILED '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-record-pfm-period' - match failure > > I'll look at the other patches that are pending in this regard to see > what needs to be squashed so that we don't break bisect. So, more context: running '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-record-pfm-period' expected exclude_hv=0, got 1 FAILED '/home/acme/libexec/perf-core/tests/attr/test-record-pfm-period' - match failure test child finished with -1 ---- end ---- Setup struct perf_event_attr: FAILED! [root@five ~]# Ian, can you take a look at this? - Arnaldo