From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69100C4727F for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:31:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138C02083B for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:31:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="f9eZupf4" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732700AbgI2Mam (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:30:42 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:30738 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732252AbgI2Ma1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:30:27 -0400 Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1601382626; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Yx/ea/GfmHPWL8/AZcDWYnHv8D4zYuSPVgAI8rje8mc=; b=f9eZupf4tbe7f54CX7/xkagQSCjL/g8aTpy7azDpOFU+5dA77iBA834BlgLhuF2BsBHVNj RLLgLRnwb1nrm/XLz8CbKavCBdHk1+PndEsSliz32qIz7f3XV0sgLLSm3/SOIOEgtesUR2 fZhrqj2ksPPecMRIP57GJy8t1pSmosA= Received: from mail-ot1-f71.google.com (mail-ot1-f71.google.com [209.85.210.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-98-PweZGk0KMhSGugpUXojsnQ-1; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:30:21 -0400 X-MC-Unique: PweZGk0KMhSGugpUXojsnQ-1 Received: by mail-ot1-f71.google.com with SMTP id c23so3113965otn.12 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 05:30:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Yx/ea/GfmHPWL8/AZcDWYnHv8D4zYuSPVgAI8rje8mc=; b=JwiXsuOC9KOsZqrw6ZalkDmfSDky/jlBhlj7qEGcW3efayUnuu8q42NjDzBJPzncYM sLMavM9I/uIuHJMlLG9PqcnO9fPG7XkDjEMAXdLAcx9Fl0Ga7oMyh0hjRj0himRHjDEL zwaiwTblCll6UeULJzLWlzT94aoQz2q9qP1LZ5fqWhV7TR//vdvMY7ekNVLm3ybbPCaJ L5HJiG9UKYeAAP8ljKiuCzqwnRqVvyiBk5albYC02RBPQ+2P7aF4U19oPm0FO9TTqMv9 p3s18GFRA38iI+IrJFOXpIlzgk0lr+P8loYIX5vLrhwK088k2fZVJIb8wFUhvDRSpvux I7BQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530GKNm+DZcrYiWnTb8SCEcahWM2l82WXbru5330bJmguEmZfge9 SG+5jcsPU/GL10VdS/+9P5BKgOFXFTeFCehch/7LQUgZSSgaSVyoeD2sqcTOcRQbQcuwEqivtcC JpHMykPemAqJo X-Received: by 2002:a9d:27a1:: with SMTP id c30mr2511808otb.214.1601382620634; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 05:30:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzIICgKLq/qlNj6YFc8BhAhxBj7fivF+xND54hI0ZrNSyZOkCIbFVrOXkue/H2mhcZ6CWn3pg== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:27a1:: with SMTP id c30mr2511791otb.214.1601382620286; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 05:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk ([2a0c:4d80:42:443::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x15sm2864828oor.33.2020.09.29.05.30.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 05:30:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 927D8183C5B; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:30:17 +0200 (CEST) From: =?UTF-8?q?Toke=20H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: daniel@iogearbox.net, ast@fb.com Cc: =?UTF-8?q?Toke=20H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= , bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Alan Maguire Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf_iter: don't fail test due to missing __builtin_btf_type_id Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:30:04 +0200 Message-Id: <20200929123004.46694-1-toke@redhat.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org The new test for task iteration in bpf_iter checks (in do_btf_read()) if it should be skipped due to missing __builtin_btf_type_id. However, this 'skip' verdict is not propagated to the caller, so the parent test will still fail. Fix this by also skipping the rest of the parent test if the skip condition was reached. Fixes: b72091bd4ee4 ("selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_seq_printf_btf helper") Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c index af15630a24dd..448885b95eed 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c @@ -172,17 +172,18 @@ static void test_task_file(void) static char taskbuf[TASKBUFSZ]; -static void do_btf_read(struct bpf_iter_task_btf *skel) +static int do_btf_read(struct bpf_iter_task_btf *skel) { struct bpf_program *prog = skel->progs.dump_task_struct; struct bpf_iter_task_btf__bss *bss = skel->bss; int iter_fd = -1, len = 0, bufleft = TASKBUFSZ; struct bpf_link *link; char *buf = taskbuf; + int ret = 0; link = bpf_program__attach_iter(prog, NULL); if (CHECK(IS_ERR(link), "attach_iter", "attach_iter failed\n")) - return; + return ret; iter_fd = bpf_iter_create(bpf_link__fd(link)); if (CHECK(iter_fd < 0, "create_iter", "create_iter failed\n")) @@ -198,6 +199,7 @@ static void do_btf_read(struct bpf_iter_task_btf *skel) if (bss->skip) { printf("%s:SKIP:no __builtin_btf_type_id\n", __func__); + ret = 1; test__skip(); goto free_link; } @@ -212,12 +214,14 @@ static void do_btf_read(struct bpf_iter_task_btf *skel) if (iter_fd > 0) close(iter_fd); bpf_link__destroy(link); + return ret; } static void test_task_btf(void) { struct bpf_iter_task_btf__bss *bss; struct bpf_iter_task_btf *skel; + int ret; skel = bpf_iter_task_btf__open_and_load(); if (CHECK(!skel, "bpf_iter_task_btf__open_and_load", @@ -226,7 +230,9 @@ static void test_task_btf(void) bss = skel->bss; - do_btf_read(skel); + ret = do_btf_read(skel); + if (ret) + goto cleanup; if (CHECK(bss->tasks == 0, "check if iterated over tasks", "no task iteration, did BPF program run?\n")) -- 2.28.0