[...]
> > >
> > > Please route the set via bpf-next otherwise merge conflicts will be severe.
> >
> > ack, fine
> >
> > in bpf-next the following two commits (available in net-next) are currently missing:
> > - 632bb64f126a: net: mvneta: try to use in-irq pp cache in mvneta_txq_bufs_free
> > - 879456bedbe5: net: mvneta: avoid possible cache misses in mvneta_rx_swbm
> >
> > is it ok to rebase bpf-next ontop of net-next in order to post all the series
> > in bpf-next? Or do you prefer to post mvneta patches in net-next and bpf
> > related changes in bpf-next when it will rebased ontop of net-next?
> 
> bpf-next will receive these patches later today,
> so I prefer the whole thing on top of bpf-next at that time.

sounds good, thx.

Regards,
Lorenzo