bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 0/5]  Implement task_local_storage
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 18:03:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201027170317.2011119-1-kpsingh@chromium.org> (raw)

From: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>

We already have socket and inode local storage since [1]

This patch series:

* Implements bpf_local_storage for task_struct.
* Implements the bpf_get_current_task_btf helper which returns a BTF
  pointer to the current task. Not only is this generally cleaner
  (reading from the task_struct currently requires BPF_CORE_READ), it
  also allows the BTF pointer to be used in task_local_storage helpers.
* In order to implement this helper, a RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID is introduced
  which works similar to RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL but does not require
  a nullness check.
* Implements a detection in selftests which uses the
  task local storage to deny a running executable from unlinking itself.


[1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/commit/?id=f836a56e84ffc9f1a1cd73f77e10404ca46a4616

KP Singh (5):
  bpf: Implement task local storage
  bpf: Implement get_current_task_btf and RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID
  bpf: Fix tests for local_storage
  bpf: Update selftests for local_storage to use vmlinux.h
  bpf: Add tests for task_local_storage

 include/linux/bpf.h                           |   1 +
 include/linux/bpf_lsm.h                       |  23 ++
 include/linux/bpf_types.h                     |   1 +
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                      |  48 +++
 kernel/bpf/Makefile                           |   1 +
 kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c                          |   4 +
 kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c                 | 327 ++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c                          |   3 +-
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c                         |  20 +-
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c                      |  16 +
 security/bpf/hooks.c                          |   2 +
 .../bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-map.rst |   3 +-
 tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool     |   2 +-
 tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c                       |   4 +-
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                |  48 +++
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c                 |   2 +
 .../bpf/prog_tests/test_local_storage.c       |  89 ++++-
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/local_storage.c       |  78 +++--
 18 files changed, 625 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c

-- 
2.29.0.rc2.309.g374f81d7ae-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2020-10-27 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-27 17:03 KP Singh [this message]
2020-10-27 17:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] bpf: Implement task local storage KP Singh
2020-10-28  1:13   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2020-10-30 10:53     ` KP Singh
2020-11-03 14:46       ` KP Singh
2020-10-28  1:22   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2020-11-03 14:52     ` KP Singh
2020-10-29 23:12   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-10-30 11:02     ` KP Singh
2020-10-29 23:27   ` Song Liu
2020-10-30 11:07     ` KP Singh
2020-10-31  0:02       ` Song Liu
2020-10-27 17:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] bpf: Implement get_current_task_btf and RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID KP Singh
2020-10-28  1:27   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2020-10-31 18:45   ` kernel test robot
2020-10-31 18:45   ` [RFC PATCH] bpf: bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto can be static kernel test robot
2020-10-27 17:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/5] bpf: Fix tests for local_storage KP Singh
2020-10-27 17:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] bpf: Update selftests for local_storage to use vmlinux.h KP Singh
2020-10-27 17:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/5] bpf: Add tests for task_local_storage KP Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201027170317.2011119-1-kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --to=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).