From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@iogearbox.net>,
maze@google.com, lmb@cloudflare.com, shaun@tigera.io,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
marek@cloudflare.com, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
eyal.birger@gmail.com, colrack@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next V7 8/8] bpf/selftests: activating bpf_check_mtu BPF-helper
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:50:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201120215051.cqrlmxtujrgaidc6@ast-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160588912738.2817268.9380466634324530673.stgit@firesoul>
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 05:18:47PM +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> Adding selftest for BPF-helper bpf_check_mtu(). Making sure
> it can be used from both XDP and TC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..09b8f986a17b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2020 Red Hat */
> +#include <uapi/linux/bpf.h>
> +#include <linux/if_link.h>
> +#include <test_progs.h>
> +
> +#include "test_check_mtu.skel.h"
> +#define IFINDEX_LO 1
> +
> +void test_check_mtu_xdp(struct test_check_mtu *skel)
> +{
> + int err = 0;
> + int fd;
> +
> + fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.xdp_use_helper);
> + err = bpf_set_link_xdp_fd(IFINDEX_LO, fd, XDP_FLAGS_SKB_MODE);
> + if (CHECK_FAIL(err))
> + return;
> +
> + bpf_set_link_xdp_fd(IFINDEX_LO, -1, 0);
> +}
> +
> +void test_check_mtu(void)
> +{
> + struct test_check_mtu *skel;
> +
> + skel = test_check_mtu__open_and_load();
> + if (CHECK_FAIL(!skel)) {
> + perror("test_check_mtu__open_and_load");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (test__start_subtest("bpf_check_mtu XDP-attach"))
> + test_check_mtu_xdp(skel);
> +
> + test_check_mtu__destroy(skel);
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ab97ec925a32
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2020 Red Hat */
> +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +
> +#include <stddef.h>
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> +
> +SEC("xdp")
> +int xdp_use_helper(struct xdp_md *ctx)
> +{
> + uint32_t mtu_len = 0;
> + int delta = 20;
> +
> + if (bpf_check_mtu(ctx, 0, &mtu_len, delta, 0)) {
> + return XDP_ABORTED;
> + }
> + return XDP_PASS;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("classifier")
> +int tc_use_helper(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
> +{
> + uint32_t mtu_len = 0;
> + int delta = -20;
> +
> + if (bpf_check_mtu(ctx, 0, &mtu_len, delta, 0)) {
> + return BPF_DROP;
> + }
> + return BPF_OK;
> +}
Patches 7 and 8 are not adequate as tests.
They do not testing the functionality of earlier patches.
bpf_check_mtu() could be returning random value and "tests" 7 and 8 would still pass.
Please fix.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-20 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-20 16:18 [PATCH bpf-next V7 0/8] bpf: New approach for BPF MTU handling Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-11-20 16:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next V7 1/8] bpf: Remove MTU check in __bpf_skb_max_len Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-11-20 16:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next V7 2/8] bpf: fix bpf_fib_lookup helper MTU check for SKB ctx Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-12-02 21:44 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-12-02 22:00 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-11-20 16:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next V7 3/8] bpf: bpf_fib_lookup return MTU value as output when looked up Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-11-20 16:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next V7 4/8] bpf: add BPF-helper for MTU checking Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-12-03 18:25 ` sdf
2020-12-14 11:52 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-11-20 16:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next V7 5/8] bpf: drop MTU check when doing TC-BPF redirect to ingress Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-11-20 16:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next V7 6/8] bpf: make it possible to identify BPF redirected SKBs Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-11-20 16:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next V7 7/8] selftests/bpf: use bpf_check_mtu in selftest test_cls_redirect Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-11-20 16:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next V7 8/8] bpf/selftests: activating bpf_check_mtu BPF-helper Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-11-20 21:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2020-11-21 7:41 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-11-24 14:33 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-11-24 16:50 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201120215051.cqrlmxtujrgaidc6@ast-mbp \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=borkmann@iogearbox.net \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=colrack@gmail.com \
--cc=eyal.birger@gmail.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lmb@cloudflare.com \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=marek@cloudflare.com \
--cc=maze@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaun@tigera.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).